Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
晕死。。。这不就是打来打去的狗咬狗一样的吗？每个男的都那么脏兮兮的。基德曼干嘛呢。。。迷一样的妈妈。真的很一般。
看得出砸了钱。但是这种早期血腥暴力的城邦野蛮文明真的欣赏不来。而且这多多少少有点神眷在身上，冷兵器打得那么血腥都没死，火山口打架都没让岩浆弄死。看得我真觉得好像有神存在。
光怪陆离的北欧中世纪，这导演每次都能把让人惊喜
5.0 趣味止于人物近乎抽搐的表演，艾格斯仿佛丧失了《女巫》中对于民俗人类学的探索而转投于完全符号化的神话叙事，大部分剧情就像《刺客信条英灵殿》的过场动画那样味如嚼蜡，就连最重要的anti-Hamlet的twist也无趣得紧，在《日出英烈祠》面前简直是过家家。
打斗软绵无力犹如儿戏，人物刻画几乎没有，最出色的就是摄影了。我先走一步。
拍摄很细腻，但是感觉剧情稍有些慢。喜欢男女主角才来看的。
但是叙事神神叨叨的，过于拖沓
北欧版《王子復仇记》，神神叨叨，泥泞又昏暗。
我不理解，这种用电影规模投资和电影化视听语言来拍舞台剧的项目是如何成功立项并拉到投资的？我不理解，没有母子乱伦后续剧情却先声夺人地能安排儿子撞见母亲换衣服情节的剧本是如何出炉的？我不理解，和汤姆克鲁斯恋爱结婚过的女人为什么上了年纪之后都长成了老妖婆的面目？
用电影方式来呈现的一篇北欧萨迦。原来莎剧《哈姆雷特》对原著中的维京民族风做了巨大的删减。
剧情太傻了，人物太假了，两个彩蛋之间隔的时间太长了，梁朝伟老了，接班人到底去哪了？
巧妙蕴含北欧文化的美国大片，活泼敦厚的诺恩斯，喜庆祥和的瓦基里，扑面而来的制片厂味，香喷喷的烤火山，北欧人（笑）（掌声）。复仇，啊，奥丁神是喜欢渡鸦的，（笑）（掌声）美国人很爱意淫他国IP，北欧人和美国佬的精彩交织。
恭喜人类在真人电影上达成了游戏cg可以达成的高度（这么一说是不是还挺没劲的，希望战神系列被拍出来，可惜会去拍的一定是爆米花导演）
村民械斗都比这有看头，唯一亮点是“此马是我造”
声效很强，剧情不评论。总体乏味，既然改就改的彻底一些么。
看了一半的时候以为是颠覆王子复仇记，强调女性意识，到头来还是红颜祸水的论调。9000万的预算去哪了？拍大景和请大咖了？以前导演的a24是神棍片，那一种不明所以的惊悚感全然消失。还是老老实实玩惊悚小成本吧，期待下一部安雅的吸血鬼吧，，，
从暗处诞生的语言，见到光和火山扭曲成根正苗红的矮树
COOOOOL~~~~~~！ 但是不好看！！
没有想象的烂，公车那一段还不错，但意外的是刘思慕在片子里真的不好看，其实他作为insta guy还可以，结果一上大银幕网红现形，偏偏还可劲儿怼脸拍，如果他是配角只拍身法的话效果应该还好点。
很想对哈姆雷特的每一个版本（含变型）说：拍的还行，以后别再拍了。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
