Somewhere in the remote region, the war ends. In the midst of ruined cities and houses in the streets, in rural hamlets, everywhere where people still live, are children who have lost their homes and parents. Abandoned, hungry, and in rags, defenseless and humiliated, they wander through the world. Hunger drives them. Little streams of orphans merge into a river which rushes forward and submerges everything in its path. The children do not know any feeling; they know only the world of their enemies. They fight, steal, struggle for a mouthful of food, and violence is merely a means to get it. A gang led by Cahoun finds a refuge in an abandoned castle and encounters an old composer who has voluntarily retired into solitude from a world of hatred, treason, and crime. How can they find a common ground, how can they become mutual friends? The castle becomes their hiding place but possibly it will also be their first home which they may organize and must defend. But even for this, the price will be very high.
To this simple story, the journalist, writer, poet, scriptwriter, movie director, and film theoretician Béla Balázs applied many years of experience. He and the director Géza Radványi created a work which opened a new postwar chapter in Hungarian film. Surprisingly, this film has not lost any of its impact over the years, especially on a profound philosophical level. That is to say, it is not merely a movie about war; it is not important in what location and in what period of time it takes place. It is a story outside of time about the joyless fate of children who pay dearly for the cruel war games of adults.
At the time it was premiered, the movie was enthusiastically received by the critics. The main roles were taken by streetwise boys of a children's group who created their roles improvisationally in close contact with a few professional actors, and in the children's acting their own fresh experience of war's turmoil appears to be reflected. At the same time, their performance fits admirably into the mosaic of a very complex movie language. Balázs's influence revealed itself, above all, in the introductory sequences: an air raid on an amusement park, seen in a montage of dramatic situations evoking the last spasms of war, where, undoubtedly, we discern the influence of classical Soviet cinematography. Shooting, the boy's escape, the locomotive's wheels, the shadows of soldiers with submachine guns, the sound of a whistle—the images are linked together in abrupt sequences in which varying shots and expressive sharp sounds are emphasized. A perfectly planned screenplay avoided all elements of sentimentality, time-worn stereotypes of wronged children, romanticism and cheap simplification. The authors succeeded in bridging the perilous dramatic abyss of the metamorphosis of a children's community. Their telling of the story (the scene of pillaging, the assault on the castle, etc) independently introduced some neorealist elements which, at that time, were being propagated in Italy by De Sica, Rossellini, and other film artists. The rebukes of contemporary critics, who called attention to "formalism for its own sake" have been forgotten. The masterly art of cameraman Barnabás Hegyi gives vitality to the poetic images. His angle shots of the children, his composition of scenes in the castle interior, are a living document of the times, and underline the atmosphere and the characters of the protagonists. The success of the picture was also enhanced by the musical art of composer Dénes Buday who, in tense situations, inserted the theme of the Marseilaise into the movie's structure, as a motive of community unification, as an expression of friendship and the possibility of understanding.
Valahol Europaban is the first significant postwar Hungarian film. It originated in a relaxed atmosphere, replete with joy and euphoria, and it includes these elements in order to demonstrate the strength of humanism, tolerance, and friendship. It represents a general condemnation of war anywhere in the world, in any form.
在脸上纹着眉眼唇线，肩上披着贵重貂皮，手上戴着布偶娃娃，口中唱着上帝福音，却都像录影棚里的海滩背景板，虚假失真。一面与边缘的艾滋病患对话，一面替花心的模范丈夫圆谎。童年时因为圣水而失禁，中年时因为药物而成瘾。在丈夫面前是黯淡的妻子，在观众面前是强颜的明星，在上帝面前是盲从的信徒。
和里卡多一家真的互为对照，两部都是写一个美国电视icon，对于不熟悉的人都有些难以下咽，但是两部其实是两个极端。里卡多一家承载了太多议题，但是索金至少是有表达的意图，这部直接放弃了表达，只是截取几个高光时刻，没有组织，看完对塔米菲反而有很多疑问。当然劳模演的是好的，但称不上好的表演
充滿友情的故事，宇宙是自由書寫的場所，眼睛在看著的設定非常能體現奧威爾的世界
劳模姐真的很拼，所以也很可惜，影片流水账式的叙事实在拉跨
失去电台和豪宅后塔米菲的眼睛画上了夸张的白。他和Jim因为在教会为眼睛Argue相遇，为信仰私奔，直到为私利而受罚。歌声无罪，如果那逝去的十年能多唱几首该多好。
好难看的片子 劳模的演技也拯救不了 剧情就像流水账 今年女主提名的成片怎么都那么稀碎 打扰了
故事觉得一般，但劳模姐值得，加菲你要加油啊。😢
ummmm作画精良了观感却没以前看的版本那么好 最后出木衫君的表情笑死www
【3星半】将信仰变现，终魂归于信仰，劳模姐对于这样的角色演绎简直不要太易如反掌，就是浓妆艳容有点过于“触目惊心”了，唱歌唱得很好听，总之重回奥提战线应该不成问题（能不能如愿拿下首封“斯宾塞”是最大的拦路虎），加菲咋越看越像欧文•威尔逊……
#TIFF 2021#影片还是传统的传记片套路，但杰西卡·查斯坦真的太拼了，整容式妆发加上她本身的造诣，完全就是大变活人，妥妥的一个缺爱但虚荣、可怜又可悲的神婆，上次这种演法还是《至暗时刻》里的加里·奥德曼，希望查斯坦也和他一样好运，能捧回一座小金人。
比想象中好看许多 女主角（以及原型）感染力也太强了叭
不是劳模姐最好的电影，但是对于她来说，可能真的是生涯难得的最好时机。
塔米菲被PUA的大半生，她妈再婚，自己能去教堂弹琴，女儿去不了教堂被孤立，她妈不仅不安慰她，反而一直打击她，搞得她十分缺爱，一直在容忍她丈夫伤害自己。当然对她伤害最大的就是她老公，利用她出名，敛财，出轨都要甩锅她！让我不解的是，她那么支持LGBTQ，为什么在性方面那么无知啊，为什么不离婚啊！后来发现她07年就去世了，前夫居然出狱了还到处蹦跶，真是好人不长寿啊！塔米菲居然和鲁保罗关系很好，舍弃这条线太可惜。塔米菲这个女主太被动了，剧本还是有问题！加菲为什么还是这么嫩，不过演得挺邪气，但跟劳模姐比，还是有差距的，真芭比肯。劳模姐这次拼了，还一展歌喉，居然还是个大vocal；不过还是靠毁容这个得奥斯卡老套路，但得夸化妆是真牛逼啊！劳模姐说塔米菲的本质是真诚，眼睛是内在的展现，所以才叫这个片名吧！
她可以 不介怀夫妻矛盾 帮丈夫谈下合作伙伴 不顾及政局投来的橄榄枝 支持同性恋群体 她直率坦诚 从始至终 她做的事特别简单 通过自己来传播上帝的爱 god loves all
感觉劳模姐贡献了这届奥斯卡所有人里面的最佳演技（其实也归功于妆发，真的为劳模姐加了好多分）（看完之后真诚希望劳模姐能得奥斯卡。
竟然是根据一部纪录片改编的故事片，二位70-80年代在美国出名的宗教布道电视人的起落故事，女主从20岁演到老年，又唱又演，痴迷执着，给40多岁的“劳模姐”（豆瓣影迷为她起的外号）提供了个太好地展示平台，获得今年奥斯卡最佳女主演的小金人实至名归！
repo：杰西卡·查斯坦非常出色地表现了塔米·菲强大的表演力。传教士的每一次布道都是一场小型表演，表演能力强、口才出众的人会吸引到越来越多的信徒。
两星半，Period.
当你的心思里都是属世的财富，上帝都会远离你；不要把自己的私欲当成上帝的旨意
7+静香1
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
