Totally unawares, Saverio, a teacher and Mario, a janitor of the same school in which they both work, travel back in time and find themselves in central Italy at the end of the 15th century. They carry with them an unresolved squabble concerning Saverio’s sister, creating a lot of tension between the two, which will increase in the plot. From this moment on they will have to come to grips with the grotesque situation they find themselves in, trying to "hitch a lift" back to the future in a most outlandish way, using and misusing their foresight of the events taking place round that time, and generally making fools of themselves in the eyes of "normal" renaissance folks. Their meeting with Leonardo da Vinci is hysterical, when they become more and more convinced that the genius is in reality a moron. Another character they meet is Savonarola the heretic, who enjoins them to repent, before he is taken to the stake, eliciting some breezy comment from them. If it weren’t for a weird kind of homesickness, they would quite enjoy living in this period, full of daring fashions and tantalising damsels.
The couple shows great chemistry and is funny in every respect. The psychology of their characters is complex and credible - for once comical roles with a depth. Basically, Saverio is an embittered petit-bourgeois forever attracted and rejected by women, envious of Mario, an easy-going proletarian every woman falls in love with. Saverio is scheming, mean and vindictive as much as Mario is naive, generous and forgiving. What a match of talents: Roberto Benigni and Massimo Troisi at the peak of combined creativity. Too bad they will never come back together for another joint venture. Or maybe it is better this way: masterpieces of this level cannot be improved on, at best they can be imitated. For this reason Non ci resta che piangere will shine like a gem in the crown of the best Italian movies of all times. Sadly not many people seem to have seen it, not even in Italy, where the viewers do not need subtitles to enjoy the hilarious juggling of the two actors with the language, but their body language can be universally appreciated.
If you miss it you will have to repent!
美国老兵与老狗一样，用完就被抛弃，这很美国
中规中矩的公路片，感觉旅途中大部分事件都是点到为止，缺乏有深度的情感建立过程。Channing Tatum前半段演得好浮夸，后边渐入佳境，喜欢狗狗带领主人在城市历险寻找失物那段，可惜太短了没能再展开一点。
Different from what I thought I would be.
在描述狗狗的电影里属于比较一般的了，情节不够感人，狗狗形象的刻画不够立体，强行煽情。
预告片要把这部片子包装成喜剧片，其实是一部有喜剧元素，写潦倒退伍军人的公路电影。钱老板演技有进步，在表现脑部受伤的前军人的病痛的戏份里表现不错。影片还小嘲了时下都市里喜欢以貌取人，头脑简单，没有深入了解就给任何事或人简单粗暴贴标签的怪象。不知道那些喜欢控诉“直男癌”的田园女权，或者喜欢把任何事件掰成“仇恨罪”的西方主流媒体会给这部影片怎么评分。影片本身我给三星，钱老板身材加一星，嘻嘻。
忠犬，忠诚守信的犬类。多数定义为救主或是被主人抛弃、遗落后，......
Again 对内容的理解败在了听力理解上 狱吏和男主的对话听的一知半解 去看望Lulu的兄弟的家庭男主人和男主的对话也一知半解 另外 他为啥中途要去装盲人蹭酒店？还有狗狗参加完葬礼后为啥又要回基地？这些疑惑不明白 不过狗狗颜色特别棒！作为家里也有狗狗的爱狗人士 感觉和狗狗有种特殊的共鸣！开头的狗狗成长记录和参加葬礼那段还都把我看哭了 偷偷抹眼泪。。。狗狗是人类的好朋友 互相拯救吧！
创伤后应激反应综合征的人狗相互治愈过程，有些镜头绝美，汽车酒馆的抱抱很治愈！
没什么存在意义的一部电影，所有设定和剧情基本上都被演过了，就连名字也起得如此敷衍，感情推进平铺直叙也没多感人。钱老板最近是缺钱了吗出片突然井喷
一颗给豆腐，一颗给你白，一颗给七一，一颗给miumiu，电影给-2颗，拍的是个啥玩意？
狗狗seek的片段太绝，还有就是最后老兵和狗建立感情的几段，最后领养下了忠犬，看到狗狗片子就会感动。无关电影本身编剧能力。
一人一狗的自我救赎之旅！我们这些没有经历过战争的人，永远也无法理解战争带来的伤害，不管是人类，还是狗狗，他们都付出了太多，也只有他们自己才能实现自我救赎！
电影没有明确的反战意义，那些一起出生入死的事迹是否值得？阿富汗、叙利亚什么的，算正义、算爱国？男主一门心思要回到战场，除了打仗，他啥也不会。男主身体的伤病，大脑的损伤，回到战场这个执念，都是病。狱卒对游骑兵的嘲笑、露露自杀的主人、沦落成盗贼的流浪汉老兵、露露的哥哥和其主人的疗愈，似乎有那么一点反战的意思。只是显得被迫和无奈。
钱老板这些年咋混的？没啥戏演就自己鼓捣片子呗，而且没把自己好莱坞人脉圈的资源用上啊，以为得客串几个大牌呢。也就半成品的剧本，每段情节都能写得更充实，然而都不了了之，演员转导演哪那么容易哦。
对于周五的晚上，钱老板+狗，绝对的双保险了。
原来是翻拍，果然是多了媚俗，演技过火独角戏，最后光明结局，加上中心思想点题…反正好莱坞式的缺点都占了。
前半程钱老板和狗都有点令人讨厌，最后10分钟还行
对于周五的晚上，钱老板+狗，绝对的双保险了。
三星半的电影，一切都中规中矩，是一部电影该有的模样，但也仅仅是这样。人和狗互相治愈的模样，是本片最大的看点。
劇情粗糙使得驚悚效果不好，也沒有反轉劇情。女主聽不懂羅馬尼亞語增加了壓抑緊張感，這表現手法很好，但實際沒運用好
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
