Umberto Lenzi is undoubtedly the king of Italian crime movies, but unfortunately; Syndicate Sadists is not the best examples of his work in this genre. Lenzi's crime flicks tend to be a cut above the rest because he makes films based on stories with a point, and they don't lack direction; but this film feels a bit too wayward to fully fit with the rest of his stuff. The film takes obvious influence from Sergio Leone's landmark western 'A Fistful of Dollars' (which in turn, took influence from Akira Kurosawa's landmark samurai flick Yojimbo), in that it features two warring families and a strong character at the centre. The crime that Lenzi focuses on is kidnapping, and we centre on a character called 'Rambo'. Rambo is dragged into the war between the two families after his brother is killed because of it. Rambo uses his brains and brawn to pit the two families against one another, in the hope of gaining revenge for his brother's death, rescuing a young boy that they've kidnapped, and ultimately letting the two sides destroy one another.
The film's biggest asset is undoubtedly Tomas Milian. Milian was put to great use by Lenzi in almost all of his crime thrillers. The range of characters he has played for Lenzi is immense, and this one is easily one of the coolest. The character is called Rambo, which immediately sprang to mind the popular Sylvester Stallone character - but for once, the Italians actually haven't stolen this name as Syndicate Sadists was released first! As usual, the film is wickedly entertaining, as we get to watch Milian get himself involved in the usual array of car chases, shootouts and brawls. Lenzi has got him riding a motorbike this time round, and every scene featuring it and Milian is a real standout! However, the film often feels like it doesn't really have anywhere to go, and this means that the running time is stretched out more than it should be. Compared to the crime films of other Italian directors, Syndicate Sadists is more than above average; but in relation to Lenzi crime flicks such as Almost Human and The Cynic, The Rat and The Fist - it doesn't stand tall as one of Lenzi's best. Still, if you're looking for ninety minutes of testosterone fuelled mayhem - Syndicate Sadists will suffice!
这玩意太不好结合了。不过思路到是新颖。新长出来的器官，不整个名副其实的夫妻肺片么
大卫柯南伯格老态龙钟也不忘创作出怎么部电影。结果看到是把痛感作为方法、点缀着冷幽默、讨论着艺术创作和资本垄断话唠寓言，以固定空间内的对话戏为主Body Horror回归更像是类型元素障眼法。好在维果影帝演技还在，蕾雅赛杜那场“表演”独白戏印象最深，大师艺术片做到忘我
虽然内核还是柯南伯格式的科技带来人的异化，但是依然好看
痛觉的消失后，人开始有被割开的欲望：被割开方可被承认，被命名于是被塑造，这是理性的胜利，也是器官的现象学。当肿瘤被接纳，被控制，被塑造，被展示，它便成了器官，便成就了艺术，成为了sex，也便诞生了意义。但sex不完全可控，不知所以的怀孕传给下一代后，肿瘤替代原始成为了自然，人因而成为非人，理性因此癫狂，亦或是进化？总之，文明与癫狂，生命的黑暗与死亡的透明，怎么办？——秩序试图深入黑暗之心，抹除非人，但杀戮只是塑造了英雄。黑暗之心永久在跳动。
有一星是给那个缝闭眼口、浑身是耳的表观效颦者，跳了一段听话跟走的提线木偶舞。
个最真实的唯一的自己。这段话表明了人的发
手术是新型性爱 那么性 爱 生育关系可以被剥离开了 身体无论怎样 政治永存
未来罪行，概念先行。吃掉塑料，净化垃圾，保护地球，不是罪行。故弄玄虚，不明所以，明星扎堆，也救不起。
咋说呢……就是看友邻影评人们说得头头是道，但是实际观感多处老人皱眉+弹幕式神游+男性配角脸盲。因为小k五官抽搐和卡痰说词的演技（美版刘浩存），和蕾老师额头月相的造型（法版包拯），难以沉浸于故事和氛围。
人工干预进化的手术改造成了自然遗传，拉马克的获得性遗传（aka用进废退）成功诈尸（现实中被孟德尔遗传学证伪，中学生物应该都讲过），李森科在棺材板下直呼内行。
多给一星给大牌云集吧。N
没有去查编剧，盲猜也是非英语国家的吧，通篇短句搭配上众多小语种国家的演员使所有对话都简洁凌厉，和镜头中大量的黑一样有吞噬力。
视觉上很有意思，但是剧本上，我有点怀疑这玩意是不是真的个有完整的故事？
除了看不懂，还让人很不舒服。密集恐惧症的那种不舒服，对自己身体里是否有个不正确器官的不舒服。
真特么垃圾！没别的评价了。以后再下载这类欧洲国家的电影我就是个傻逼！
性即手术，解剖即快感，新型进化的展现，却是一场器官血肉交融的狂欢，不仅是身体进行的一场革命，更是人类思维的一场政治战争，渴望顺应变化和旧古思想遵从器官逻辑的人，本质上都在对社会未来作出自己的抉择，柯南伯格依旧有像四十年前般的前卫，最后其实也是一场向社会媒体公众的新导向，有《录像带谋杀案》的味道。但可惜在于，场景和对话全在解释这个世界，显得过于空洞，那些极致的肉体美学让人惊喜，也挽回不了刻意的展现和沉闷的叙事，喜欢却也不太能给出高分，想起当初看柯南伯格老片的惊艳感，或许是能代入到那个年代所突出的独特思维，而本片的设定在这个时代，只能说还可以更加大胆
7星，去掉性感的概念底子里是现实主义，手法大于内容。实践理论而非解构和讨论。不过柯南伯格能让小K把长久以来的表演缺陷发挥到极致形成一种人物风格，挺厉害的哈哈哈哈。
观感为什么这么像NWR...叙事高度概念化，空间高度场景化，最后形成的表达是高度寓言化的，在一个社会构架和人的身体皆是支离破碎的境况中，唯有艺术和审美还在支持着现代性文化的框架，恰巧印证了本雅明废墟-寓言的结构。而柯南伯格，在最后用自觉进化者的眼泪，宣告了某种弥赛亚降临。一次没有加以论证的自我重复和升华。
{★★★} 原则上我讨厌这些写起来比看起来有趣的电影，深刻吗，它们只是让观众觉得自己深刻而已。但我不羞于承认自己喜欢这部空洞的敌托邦寓言：与身体相关的，自然也与政治相关；以秩序进行独裁，正如镇压进化的身体暴政。矛盾的是，柯南波格若有似无地暗示阻碍革命发生的并非仅有旧秩序，还有艺术，无论肤浅或深刻。我为他的哲学论文捏一把汗，但在严肃艺术的领域内，不存在比自嘲的艺术家更有趣的东西。
冷漠，旁观。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
