Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
这个跟原版一比，只能说差的不是一星半点，叙事上就是强行倒叙，一点技巧都没有，于是人物铺垫也不够，情节逻辑也有问题。你说心脏都直接拿走了，就没别的医院能动手术了？市长大人抢心脏杀人灭口的事都干得出来，最后会良心上受到谴责主动帮助主角？还有，这剧情和误杀有个半毛钱关系，起个新的名字不行吗？
5、宋洋演技突破不小，可喜可贺；
拍起来套路太低级了，强行煽情，好多地方逻辑讲不清，翻拍片怎么拍成这样
医闹真的是没有成本啊，就算你是杀人未遂，也可以轻飘飘的说一句，你是好医生，所以我不杀你了。还能换回被杀者的一句感谢。手术室里故意营造的恐怖氛围真的搞笑，手术室里有多亮是一点不知道吗？
精神get到了，故事讲得好像蹩脚，台词也有点尬。。所以“误杀”了谁？
市长如此亲民，宁可丑闻曝光成为阶下囚，也要帮另一个父亲演最后一出戏，新曼市的人民过的不会太差；
泰国吃瓜群众也太敬业了，下这么大雨也要吃完这个瓜…
器官移植名单如此透明，市长都需要跟屁民抢心脏，这地下器官买卖估计也没多大赚头；
翻拍迫在眉梢
其实我本来对翻拍没什么偏见，但是一想到我们这种还不错的电影都不是原创剧本还是多多少少有点失望。不过总得来说还是对味了的
期望越大 失望越大！太極端了 代價太大了吧？這難道是全世界最後一顆心臟了嗎？有什麼能比陪伴更重要呢？況且這份父愛太沈重了 有沒有想過孩子能不能承受呢？ 節奏太慢了 bug很多 幸好演員演技都還不錯 也就能看吧⋯
政府居然没有禁止电视台的直播，慕了。
这集有些镜头怪怪的（不怎么好的那种怪，类似教材课本那种）、带孩子的慎重…也可能我想多了
7.0分。跟《误杀》是相同的内核(背景同样是泰国)，不同的故事。一位善良的小人物父亲，最后选择牺牲自己，成就家庭和公正，卑微而伟大，甚至可称为圣人了，理性的有点可怕
3.5
豆瓣评分低到看不下去了，只能把五颗星星都点亮了，就算做黑暗里的萤火虫吧……
讲阶级，讲贫富差距，讲社会问题，左翼评论家们怎么看？好不好？悬不悬？浮不浮？
泰国吃瓜群众也太敬业了，下这么大雨也要吃完这个瓜…
就觉挺好看，场景简单，不过结尾反转有点生硬
4.5/10，这种电影时常让我怀疑存在一个我完全无法理解的平行宇宙，而我是不相信平行宇宙的。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
