Totally unawares, Saverio, a teacher and Mario, a janitor of the same school in which they both work, travel back in time and find themselves in central Italy at the end of the 15th century. They carry with them an unresolved squabble concerning Saverio’s sister, creating a lot of tension between the two, which will increase in the plot. From this moment on they will have to come to grips with the grotesque situation they find themselves in, trying to "hitch a lift" back to the future in a most outlandish way, using and misusing their foresight of the events taking place round that time, and generally making fools of themselves in the eyes of "normal" renaissance folks. Their meeting with Leonardo da Vinci is hysterical, when they become more and more convinced that the genius is in reality a moron. Another character they meet is Savonarola the heretic, who enjoins them to repent, before he is taken to the stake, eliciting some breezy comment from them. If it weren’t for a weird kind of homesickness, they would quite enjoy living in this period, full of daring fashions and tantalising damsels.
The couple shows great chemistry and is funny in every respect. The psychology of their characters is complex and credible - for once comical roles with a depth. Basically, Saverio is an embittered petit-bourgeois forever attracted and rejected by women, envious of Mario, an easy-going proletarian every woman falls in love with. Saverio is scheming, mean and vindictive as much as Mario is naive, generous and forgiving. What a match of talents: Roberto Benigni and Massimo Troisi at the peak of combined creativity. Too bad they will never come back together for another joint venture. Or maybe it is better this way: masterpieces of this level cannot be improved on, at best they can be imitated. For this reason Non ci resta che piangere will shine like a gem in the crown of the best Italian movies of all times. Sadly not many people seem to have seen it, not even in Italy, where the viewers do not need subtitles to enjoy the hilarious juggling of the two actors with the language, but their body language can be universally appreciated.
If you miss it you will have to repent!
第七穿插连应到一百五十七人，实到一人！
突突突，突突突。战场上哪有那么多时间感慨和抒情。。。
致敬先烈！
看电影时我就想，前面打得那么细致，会不会最后改结尾？但最后也忠实于史实。这就让整个电影的基调都不对头，折腾两小时最后一场空，这种事情现实中常有，但文艺作品里这么写会很别扭。
没看下去，可能是我的问题，和导演、演员无关。
伦敦观影。3.5分，镜头有些过于血腥，人物稍显脸谱化，情节有些单薄
没经历过战争的我们是幸运的，同时也是脆弱的。
如果两部电影删去尴尬与槽点剪成一部时长长些的片或许会好很多
整体比前作流畅，也更残酷，但是我更喜欢前作那些动人的情节。
美军残暴战争残酷战斗残忍，和平难得而不可得，致敬英雄，超越生死。
如果是我面对就只有害怕
对比长津湖，好了太多。把一场战斗说清楚，总归比说一个战役要好的多。
水门桥
热血男儿离故乡，冰天雪地端步枪。以弱胜强炸大桥，逼走美军保家乡。
如果知道了结局，就是无论如何努力终归只是体验一个过程，那么那些战士是选择拼死一搏还是选择全身而退，在战场上没有错与对，只有去执行任务或者任务失败，花出很大的代价通过战争去赢得面子，那么交战的双方都是输家，一打仗就输了。
相比第一部这部显得更独立简单，看完之后总感觉少点什么，有些画面过于血腥并不适合低龄儿童。
宏大史诗，战争戏不如第一步，人物描写比第一部好些，特别是千玺特别出彩，某些桥段过于套路和主角光环，看着有些尴尬
战争场面开场就入戏，又爽又燃，志愿军和美军正面硬刚，轰炸机，坦克，榴弹炮，枪战应接不暇，炮火轰鸣的视觉和音效中，真实刺激，仿佛身临其境，十分震撼！当然重要的是，这部电影还是那么的感人好哭，让人的情绪拉的满满地！爱国情，战友情，兄弟情，父女情全都戳在泪点上，在影院一直哭的缓不过来劲。 他们在自己大好年华把该打的仗打完了，才有我们现在的太平盛世！勇敢无畏的七连YYDS, 志愿军YYDS！
在我心里，没有一部电影可以拍好朝鲜战争。电影一方面太浓墨重彩，一方面又太过苍白，不论如何都很难重现70年前那些轻描淡写又重如泰山的牺牲。看到某些场面可能想说太夸张啦！但曾经有比这更夸张的；有些场面想说太单调了，但现实比这些还要苍白。但不管怎么说，都还是庆幸有这些描写朝鲜战争的片子，至少他们可以提醒一代又一代的中华儿女铭记这段艰难的时光。
第七穿插连应到157人，实到1人。——为这句台词打4分
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
