Whenever I see La Paura I think of it as a companion piece to Eyes Wide Shut, or maybe it is the other way around. Adultery makes both films tick but in different ways. I think Phillip French was right on the money when he pointed out a Wizard of Oz thing in Kubrick's last work. Like Dorothy, Tom and Nicole go through fantasies and nightmares and at the end Dorothy's reassuring childish motto "there's no place like home" is ironically updated to the adult circumstantial adage "there's no sex like marital sex". Kubrick's take is intellectual, he never leaves the world of ideas to touch the ground. He taunts the audience first with an erotic movie and then with a thriller and refuses to deliver either of them. He was married to his third wife for 40 years, until he died. Rossellini was still married to Ingrid Bergman when he directed La Paura; they had been adulterous lovers and their infidelity widely criticized La Paura is a tale, a noirish one. The noir intrigue is solved and the tale has a happy ending. The city is noir; the country is tale, the territory where childhood is possible. The transition is operated in the most regular way: by car, a long-held shot taken from the front of the car as it rides into the road, as if we were entering a different dimension. Irene (Bergman) starts the movie: we just see a dark city landscape but her voice-over narration tells us of her angst and informs us that the story is a flashback, hers. Bergman's been cheating on her husband. At first guilt is just psychological torture but soon expands into economic blackmail and then grows into something else. From beginning to end the movie focuses on what Bergman feels, every other character is there to make her feel something. Only when the director gives away the plot before the main character can find out does he want us to feel something Bergman still can't. When she finds out, we have already experienced the warped mechanics of the situation and we may focus once again on the emotional impact it has on Bergman's Irene. In La Paura treasons are not imagined but real, nightmares are deliberate and the couple's venom suppurates in bitter ways. Needless to say, Ingrid has another of her rough rides in the movies but Rossellini doesn't dare put her away as he did in Europa 51, nor does he abandon her to the inscrutable impassivity of nature (Stromboli). His gift is less transcendent and fragile than the conclusion of Viaggio in Italia. He just gives his wife as much of a fairy tale ending as a real woman can have, a human landscape where she can finally feel at home. Back to the country, a half lit interior scene where shadows suggest the comfort of sleep. After all, it's the "fairy godmother" who speaks the last words in the movie.
换汤不换药又来一波？好尬！我认可宋康昊的演技，可这部戏真的够分量拿影帝吗？从哪开始乱了？我想应该是《燃烧》惜败开始，再到《寄生虫》折桂，现在又是宋康昊凭《掮客》拿影帝！🙄
影帝的话我觉得姜东元演的更好啊，开头感觉在看电视剧，还是日本式内敛版的，这么好的题材可发挥的部分拍的如此平淡如白开水,是枝一直就很中庸，中规中矩一向如他，近一点的《小偷家族》远一点的《如父如子》《无人知晓》都是类似题材翻来覆去的拍没有一点惊喜
这次，是枝裕和的影像犹如那只从画面外伸来的手，替我们遮住了一切肮脏与不堪，讲了一出彻头彻尾的童话。故事框架是《小偷家族》式的，但搭建起的安全防护却是《海街日记》式的（人物的阴暗面被大量缩减，只见那些善意与温情）。是枝裕和的角色总是不具有广泛意义上的“道德性”，他们是小偷、是抛弃孩子的母亲、是转卖婴儿的掮客。但是枝裕和的镜头是极具“包容性”的，常常以一种“平视”的状态注视着角色，客观地记录着时间的流逝，让那些被谴责、被边缘化的角色在影像的流动下逐渐被观众所理解、共情。结尾处海边的暖阳是对是枝裕和这次温柔的最好体现，当然也不可避免的被批过于糖水，但我还是爱。
便签只留下名字，心中或许刻下了归期；期盼是昂贵甜点，现实却是化掉的冰淇淋。缝纫机补不回记忆的裂痕，洗车间盛满了贫瘠的欢乐，奔赴星空或者大海，失去归属便只是流浪。交换分期还是现金，明天都是支付不起的未来。在失修的面包车厢，没有血缘的家人不曾被遗漏；在登顶的摩天轮里，支离破碎的亲情被奉为圣经。
“谢谢你的出生”，跟《小偷家族》一样，是枝裕和依旧在讨论非血缘关系的家庭联系，叙事节奏缓和，表演真切，将“掮客”这类人换了种思路去表现，母亲的加入也合理地让观众情绪往“这家人”身上一边倒（但真正可恶的人贩子去死）宋康昊戛纳影帝实至名归
“不是被抛弃的孩子，而是被守住的孩子” 虽然是韩国电影，但内里涌动的是枝裕和信奉的日式温情，淡化了身份标签，所有人回归到“父亲”“母亲”“孩子”这样最初的角色；稀释了情节冲突，重在陌生人之间跨越血缘的情感联结。临时重组的五口之家，一场意外迭生的行程，是逃亡是旅行也是另一种抵达。
在警察潜伏追踪途中，也看到了这一组临时家庭的默契与温馨，他们都有美好的结局。
不像是枝裕和的是枝裕和作品。也许是在韩国制作完成吧故事不如大师以日本为背景作品来真实细腻更像大师学韩剧韩影。剧情起伏都太刻意人物也不深刻其实宋康昊表演不算戛纳影帝水准也就正常发挥反观IU表演可圈可点，大导现在倚名卖名啊去法国拍完来韩国拍看看那天来中国拍吧？
在是枝裕和的作品中属于一般的，但是介于我是他粉丝还有我比较喜欢宋康昊，多加一颗星吧
看的打瞌睡了，估計以後對此片也沒什麼印象。
#22#50不知道是不在日本水土不服还是剧本本身的原因，就像寄生虫一样的刻意，让人游离其外难以动情。摩天轮上的哭戏是为数不多的亮点，但对比小偷家族里安藤樱那可以影史留名的一分钟哭戏，差距可见一斑
《寄生虫》三年后，又一次见识到了宋康昊的魅力。
可能因为导演是是枝裕和，比起其他韩影又多了不少的格外的温情，确实很像东京教父，这种临时拼凑又注定不可能长久的家人会有一种特殊的感动。
以是枝裕和的标准，这一部显出平庸和疲态。熟悉的社会议题和抱有对人性的善意和温情，抛出问题的探讨并不急于给出主观结论。就像片中裴斗娜和IU对孩子生与不生的不同看法，没有标准答案。抛开出身背景，我们都“谢谢你出生到这个世界”。
一股子《小偷家族》味，没想到还真是是枝裕和导的，但比《小偷家族》差远了，一些用心设计的走心对话和动作显得过于刻意。看着IU在这部戏里的表演就像看《我的大叔》。剧情设置也有点松散，前面看得打瞌睡。
新瓶装旧酒 几场戏的处理和「小偷家族」如出一辙 本来以为是想借助韩国的星光团队在国际上获得更高的声量 现在感觉是希望借助韩国团队的本土化处理让这个前作的复刻有一些不同的风貌 为了增加故事的新鲜感 是枝裕和借了公路片的壳表现家族紧密的联系 四五个人挤在一个小小的房车里吵架聊天很容易让观众移情 三线叙事的剧本能看出是枝裕和的努力 但没怎么处理好 也缺少韩影快速叙事的工业魄力 可能这个故事还是适合在日本定心拍两个半小时比较好 天台 窗边 摩天轮 三场戏印象深刻 剧本只给了IU发挥的空间 一个表面冷漠 内心苦闷的太妹妈妈在屏幕里闪闪发光
换掉韩语没有地域性，韩国变成了另一个日本。限定版掮客家族，几个人平淡得还不如警察有戏，被抛弃的还要卖孩子，自己养不了生下来也要卖掉。宋康昊凭这片儿拿影帝太可惜了，处理起来毫无压力。
全韩国阵容但依然日式，感觉是拍了一部韩国给的命题作文
是枝裕和是在完成一部命题作文吗？怎么会如此温吞？你可是是枝裕和啊！
是枝裕和毫无惊喜之作，我看过他的四部电影里最差。宋康昊凭这部片拿戛纳影帝有点儿补奖的意思，他大热那几部哪部不比这部演得好……
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
