Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
Apple TV+一贯路线，科幻外壳包裹的家庭温软核心。未来世界UI设计和家装风格保持Apple产品概念高度一致的平行质感，干净冷寂，为探讨弥留之际生死哲思的镜像对话构造透彻空明的氛围舞台。类似的以克隆人延续不治之症病躯身份的伦理辩题早在Klara and the Sun等很多文艺作品加以探讨，但本片无意挖掘更深向度的思考，始终紧扣天鹅之死悲鸣绝叫的题眼，细腻温馨的走马灯如脉脉流水贯通复制双生的对视之间。一块巧克力的尴尬邂逅和啤酒就毛豆的父子告别尤其动人。归根到底，仍然是一部小品文，Mahershala Ali优秀的演技使这个毫无新意的过时故事增添了许多可看性。Dumb Witness再现，备份重生绝对不是万无一失的白色谎言，我们只能止步于Cameron无憾又悲恸的那一行泪，被爱的配方满足。
看了简介才去看的，设定很新颖，但拍得却很俗气。正确的拍法应该是让观众跟随克隆人的视角，最起码要以克隆人为主角，讲述本体死后，克隆人替代本体生活的故事，而不是让观众看本体临死前的各种麻烦事儿，搞的像部家庭肥皂剧，白白浪费了观众宝贵的周六晚间时光。
讲真，不要被烂片名和低豆瓣评分而蒙蔽双眼，用你的眼光去看它，再去评价它，它是一部好电影，是的，关于人生、生命的思考！
3.5 男主跟儿子作别时吃毛豆喝啤酒的场景，让我一度以为导演是个中国人
苹果智能产品概念展望。随着科技社会发展，人活得越来越像机器。克隆人代替品属老题材，记忆移植等同永生，记忆篡改、无备份相当于死去。虽有道德触碰，只是我觉得它完全可以公开，交代好后事，终结也不是可怕的事情。★★★☆/7.1
罗生门三重叙述的多有重叠拖沓不够精悍，其它没毛病，片尾决斗拍的好极。女权在中世纪，看谁敢欺负小变态(ง'-̀'́)ง 4＋
真tdd看笑了 啥都是女人的错 要点脸吧 第三部分持续发笑 现在看来 RS的确是伪平权的代表人物 patriarchy几大要素 1、女人是男人的附属品 地位低下（各方面 包括话语权决策权等） 2、女人的首要任务是生育 3、 普信男妈宝男泛滥 4、（大）部分女人跟着男人欺负女人 / 笑死 有男的说这部片女权给不出高分 两边不讨好的电影是真的少见
真tdd看笑了 啥都是女人的错 要点脸吧 第三部分持续发笑 现在看来 RS的确是伪平权的代表人物 patriarchy几大要素 1、女人是男人的附属品 地位低下（各方面 包括话语权决策权等） 2、女人的首要任务是生育 3、 普信男妈宝男泛滥 4、（大）部分女人跟着男人欺负女人 / 笑死 有男的说这部片女权给不出高分 两边不讨好的电影是真的少见
看到最后一幕
小变态演的好。看完以后我才反应过来:婆婆是大傻
真相并不重要，人情世故才是。
电影是好的，但当下这种气候，这样的叙事也过于安全保守了吧~
真tdd看笑了 啥都是女人的错 要点脸吧 第三部分持续发笑 现在看来 RS的确是伪平权的代表人物 patriarchy几大要素 1、女人是男人的附属品 地位低下（各方面 包括话语权决策权等） 2、女人的首要任务是生育 3、 普信男妈宝男泛滥 4、（大）部分女人跟着男人欺负女人 / 笑死 有男的说这部片女权给不出高分 两边不讨好的电影是真的少见
三大主演演技太牛了，真正的大制作，场景服装及其还原历史，看的很爽。
厉害的是人物视角变化后的一些细节，就连强奸戏，男性视角相比女性都会简化或者说“美化”很多。只有女性视角才表现出眼泪鼻涕，歇斯底里。一度想给五星，后半小时还是有点过于白给了，把现代女权觉醒的意识套到那个时代。
似乎“不接种就不给绿码”的玄疑故事，此片以“尊严-名誉-虚荣”交织“knife-wife-life”，女的要“爱拼才会赢”，男的是“爱赢才会拼”，男的决斗赢了，最后只有往耶路撒冷拼去了……如此看来，还是《道士下山》里暗含的“接种”比较委曲（不是“委屈”）。
Cameron流着眼泪微笑
以另外一个存在代替自己去爱所爱之人，
武侠小说里也常常既决胜负，也决生死。但现实里好像没什么名人决斗而死，嘴炮居多。
生命走到尽头，该怎么去和生活和亲人告别。女主弹钢琴唱歌那段很戳人。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
