Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
辛芷蕾那是幸子头吗？
夺宝奇情，怪力乱神，故布疑阵，漏洞连连，像是书页泛黄的地摊文学。不管有没有营养，总归是一碗爽口的猪油炒饭。
6分。将就看，不够精彩，主要剧情是简单故事复杂化了。比试鉴宝那一段不错
也是等了好久好久终于看到了，虽然我印象中的“五脉宇宙”，一定不是这样一关关密室逃脱的戏码。几段鉴别古董时做的的特效画面很亮眼，希望以后《国家宝藏》《假如会说话》之类的节目可以学学。以及，在这一片选角中，我还真的觉得李现是最合适的几个之一，药不然在第一部小说里那种高傲，少爷派的气质还是被出色地呈现了的。
哈，一般。整体比《刺小》稍差一点。处于可看可不看的水准。优点是结构比较完整，缺点是人物塑造太烂了不完全怪演员，你看葛大爷这种大神级的演员，都做的很辛苦。
娱乐性挺足的，但总觉得背景人物和情感铺垫不明不白？李现从头到尾脸上写着“我是反派”，咏梅这片和《风去洛阳》都是演大佬，气场全开。
7.0/10
适合看过原著或者电视剧的观看 毕竟节奏紧凑了很多 然后主要背景又能从书里或者电视剧里脑补 不过话又说回来了 我到底是着了哪门子道看了书了也看了电视剧了还要来再看一次电影……
我就觉得一般吧，三星；爱看鬼吹灯系列的家人就说还不错，也许像吧。辛难看，李现太现眼。结局设定说不上好不好，但蛮有新意
电影版的古董局中局，简直是一步一错，瓷不过手，最基本的常识。光绪仿乾隆不能说是假的，只是后代仿前代。谁家古画让人那么展卷，就为了帅啊，能多看看故宫的纪录片人家怎么操作么，真假没鉴定出来的时候都得给人家好好对待啊。
很成熟的商业片，节奏顺畅，演员表演都在线。我现在不喜欢看文艺片了，就喜欢轻松的，不要太多说教的，或者小众犯罪类型片也可以。
要是没看过电视剧真是有点难以跟上他们的节奏，啥也没交代清楚就演完了…演完了…我还挺喜欢三个主角的，三个人各演各的也是难得。现在才知道电视剧讲的还真挺不错的…..
马伯庸的这个故事拍成电影是合适的，解谜是件好玩儿的事儿，不是画张藏宝图那么简单，摩斯密码、棋局、十二地支都用上，然后告诉你这都是骗局，谜底全在一句话，就怕敌人抢先读到这句，到头来功亏一篑，人物动机值得商榷，很多疑问需要解决。
如果能忽略掉所有不合理的地方，还是好看的。
结尾仓促了些，李现拿到佛头后的人设反转稍显突兀，不过也不是什么硬伤，反正重点都落在雷佳音了，情节紧凑流畅，解谜没多烧脑但也没多白痴，喜剧部分做的也自然，以及李现视觉舒适度满分，冲着这片喊国产片没救的人，多得是伪装佳作的烂片给你们嚎。
完整度高，节奏紧凑不松散，迷局破解和故事推进都比较顺畅，唯一破绽就是几个小时那没法从洛阳乡下赶到北京会场吧？
可以一看。跟着电影故事探索，饭后电影。李现的角色是真滴不好。
没看过原著，感觉还行，合格的商业片。最重要的是，马亲王有两下子。
剧情节奏感觉就像打游戏一直在按esc跳过过场
许愿要不是自学成才，还真解不了他爷爷和他爹布的局中局。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
