Fraught with over obvious symbolism, Hartley's early feature is nonetheless a joy to watch. Hal here shows us his uncanny ability to cast his characters perfectly came early in his career.
Adrienne Shelley is a near perfect foil to herself, equal parts annoying teen burgeoning in her sexuality (though using sex for several years); obsessed with doom and inspired by idealism gone wrong she is deceptively – and simultaneously – complex and simple. Her Audrey inspires so many levels of symbolism it is almost embarrassingly rich (e.g., her modeling career beginning with photos of her foot – culminating her doing nude (but unseen) work; Manhattan move; Europe trip; her stealing, then sleeping with the mechanics wrench, etc.)
As Josh, Robert Burke gives an absolutely masterful performance. A reformed prisoner/penitent he returns to his home town to face down past demons, accept his lot and begin a new life. Dressed in black, and repeatedly mistaken for a priest, he corrects everyone ("I'm a mechanic"), yet the symbolism is rich: he abstains from alcohol, he practices celibacy (is, in fact a virgin), and seemingly has taken on vows of poverty, and humility as well. The humility seems hardest to swallow seeming, at times, almost false, a pretense. Yet, as we learn more of Josh we see genuineness in his modesty, that his humility is indeed earnest and believable. What seems ironic is the character is fairly forthright in his simplicity, yet so richly drawn it becomes the viewer who wants to make him out as more than what he actually is. A fascinatingly written character, perfectly played.
The scene between Josh and Jane (a wonderful, young Edie Falco . . . "You need a woman not a girl") is hilarious . . . real. But Hartley can't leave it as such and his trick, having the actors repeat the dialogue over-and-over becomes frustratingly "arty" and annoying . . . until again it becomes hilarious. What a terrific sense of bizarre reality this lends the film (like kids in a perpetual "am not"/"are too" argument).
Hartley's weaves all of a small neighborhood's idiosyncrasies into a tapestry of seeming stereotypes but which delves far beneath the surface, the catalyst being that everyone believes they know what the "unbelievable truth" of the title is, yet no two people can agree (including our hero) on what exactly that truth is. A wonderful little movie with some big ideas.
一个真神婆遇到一个打着宗教旗帜的男野心家，被同妻被嘲笑被卷入一无所有，但她依然乐观积极勇敢，她爱上帝爱妈妈爱丈夫爱世人，她只是极度缺爱渴望关注始终童心。啊，人太复杂了！
这个片子值得一个奥斯卡影后？劳模姐的表演一直是一样的。
劳模姐真的，量变导致质变了，加菲被远远甩在后面，就像小李子和温斯莱特
老IP就应该做好是圈钱的准备。全程出去两次，最后还是没熬完提前退场了……连我隔壁5岁小儿都觉得不好看。两星算仁慈
劳模姐终于不演爽剧大女主了，奔走相告！天真而破碎的塔米菲，唏嘘的味道拍出来了，深度还是欠了不少。无论如何，这就是本届奥斯卡最具突破表演——跳出“女强人”光环的劳模姐，更有厚度，更生动了！
每次看动画片，我都觉得我比反派更适合当反派，居然还让他演讲完了？是我直接关麦，然后“保安，保安在哪里！？”
一边做事一边放背景里，三心二意看掉的，女主演得很好。我对基督教主题的故事（虽然这个是揭露黑幕），都不是特别感兴趣。传说还有两个创作中的音乐剧也是改编Tammy Faye的故事，一个由Elton John创作，一个由David Yazbek创作，都是大手笔，还真是受欢迎呢。
在我认为，这种剧场版电影多是有狗尾续貂之嫌；脱离原著经典剧情用原班人马延伸番外就很难跳出原有的人物刻画再现经典，顶破天也可能是个好 发挥正常就容易得分中等偏下！！！
矛盾的电影，一面是查斯坦拼命营造的天真，另一面是导演有意无意流露出的看笑话心态；只呈现人物的各种（以创伤为主的）状态，挖出了一堆伤口，却完全没有剥开她的内心，也没有展现其真实影响力，“时代”只不过是个以艺术字和电视荧幕为形式出现的外部装饰。还好最后一镜是温柔的，没有再补上一个残忍的反打，电影层面上看也比《朱迪》《贤妻》好不少。
里面内容可不太简单啊，有1984、独裁者等等，有点儿意思
比想象中好看许多 女主角（以及原型）感染力也太强了叭
颁奖季，查斯坦，传记片。捞出三个关键词之后本片就像是配方料理，颜色考究但口味寡淡。同样刻画政治保守的女性公众人物，美国夫人的恐怖反讽在塔米菲凝固成假面的厚重眼妆之下却只能捕捉零散破碎的泪光，孤行拥抱性少数群体和婚姻与传教的盲信与前者形成若即若离的回文。迷失在享受聚光的表演和献身宗教的虔诚两者界限，造神堕落又重拾歌声的信仰危机仿佛范霍文圣母的当代美国化身，自反和解读的空间却浅薄近无。回溯童年心理史学，双眼癫狂的明亮不仅受盔甲般的化妆加持，内心狂热和表演天赋才让她的布道魔法被太空神迹传播到千万家庭。观众信徒是否有分别？为祂代言的声音究竟该如何面对名利荣宠诱惑保持所谓清廉的纯洁？查斯坦为影后之路亲自制作，女性视角聚焦父权运作中强颜欢笑粉底的裂痕，她始终无法彻底拥有自己的福音，无论作为神婆还是圣母。
沉迷于名利，盲从于虚荣，堕落于贪婪，违心的虔诚会让一切跌落神坛，而Tammy Faye用了一辈子去收获这个惨痛的教训，影片最后，当她通过热爱的镜头再次纵情高歌，她终于看清了内心深处信仰的真理。劳模姐从年轻时风光无限的张扬，到年迈时历经沧桑的隐忍，眼影越深，表演越动人，明年颁奖季的有力竞争者。
唯一一个值得夸赞的地方，太空坦克大战的画面居然比垃圾快餐星球大战拍的还有意思！
国语配音是真不行，尖锐刺耳；且整体音效也尖锐刺耳；
化妆一流，演技二流，故事三流，两星，不推荐！
可以与教皇奥利十世媲美，塔米·菲也是一个虔诚基督徒同时又是一个超级享乐主义者。她和她的丈夫吉姆——男女通吃的骗子，两人创办的电视台在基督教世界里无线风光二十年，一时无两。
最感人的台词是，梦想的一半，就像羽翼一般，我衷心的感谢你，我一直都明白，正因为有你，我才是我自己。
感觉好碎啊 什么都想讲但什么都没仔细讲 看得我想睡觉
这部电影是传记类电影。一下子让我想起之前看过的《玫瑰人生》，第80届奥斯卡最佳女主角。其实传记类电影，主角，很难get到人物的灵魂的，而一旦有了那点东西，或多或少，就是一部好的传记，也是好的表演。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
