This was the first of the videos that started a trend of sex education videos in the early 1990s . I guess the idea behind it was for liberated women to go into a high street store and buy it without any type of guilt or inhibition , but no doubt the main buyer market was teenage boys and dirty old men
THE LOVERS GUIDE is groundbreaking in the fact that it publicised that the couples involved were real life partners but this is slightly dishonest , yes the main couple featured Wendy and her husband were indeed a real life couple who'd been married several years but there was some public controversy that at least one of the couples Kathryn ( The gorgeous brunette ) and Marino ( The well buffed geezer with a ponytail ) had never met one another until they appeared on set where they had unprotected sex for the camera . For a video that self righteously dedicates segments to safe sex it is rather hypocritical
Seeing as it's for education purposes and not pornography as such there's limits as to what can be shown but as a sex education video it's not uninformative though I doubt if you'll be gasping " I never knew that "
As a footnote the main couple featured became something of sexual problem agony aunts in the British press - Until it was revealed that Wendy's husband had a serious heart condition which put a stop to sex . I almost felt sorry for this couple who confessed that they used to make love as often as ten times a day but now couldn't make love once a day because it was too dangerous . My small amount of sympathy soon vanished when shortly afterwards the couple split up and raced off to the gutter press in order to dish the dirt on one another to the highest bidder .
拿到的片源不好，有卡顿，有模糊，有少了的字幕翻译。故事可以呀～就是如果这样的事发生在自己身边，能接受这样的选择吗？
软科幻，情感上大于内容，阿里演的太好了，每一个眼神都饱含着情感，内容不多，就导致太碎片化，立意也很浅，像概念的延伸
《Moon River》每个人的人生就是一条条河流，或汹涌澎湃，或平静流淌。
Look me in the eyes and tell me you love me
究竟是阿里把这个角色变装逼了 还是阿里把啥都变装逼了 阿里能不能挑战一下演个kevinhart那种角色
Apple流媒出品，俨然一副自家广告宣传片的样式，UI界面动画效果和家居装饰风格都透着浓浓的苹果未来软硬件产品的极简设计美感。陈旧科幻概念包装下的温软小品，电影既没有野心进行更深层次的伦理探讨，也无意走惊悚路线去设置反转玩阴谋论，回避了争议焦点，仅仅以爱为名做文章，中规中矩地讲述了一个关于生命与死亡、自私与无私的故事，用天鹅濒死前发出的凄美绝叫比喻癌症患者临终前为了延续爱做出的痛苦抉择，克隆体作为替代品可以完全复制本体的容貌与记忆，却无法真正转移灵魂深处的情感，这般高尚的爱未免太过自我感动。迷你短片的体量，靠拖拉的回忆和内心戏抻到了两小时，导演似乎还没有驾驭长片的能力，实际那点内容早已被抖音各大影视类营销号归纳总结了。在我看来同题材不如《Moon》好看，类似文艺调性也差《Her》太多。
什么定义了你这个人？记忆，长相身体？当你最亲密的人都分辨不出来，是该感叹技术高超还是为自己感到悲哀，人反倒不如一只狗更加能看到本质
“I love you. Always have. Always will.” Even if I’m no longer here, the love persists. And that matters the world.
老套的克隆设定，刻意设置的冲突，让这部电影看着非常拧巴，最重要的是这个所谓的爱与死亡的主题实在肤浅，尽管大部分世人都深陷于此——但其实这提醒了我一件事，那就是电影不是为了那些“成熟”的观众看的，而是为了更多没有看过和感受过的人拍摄。这正是艺术和人类的关系。
《Moon River》每个人的人生就是一条条河流，或汹涌澎湃，或平静流淌。
无论是临终告别还是爱和你能否克隆继续，都是非常喜欢的母题，气氛表演美术都可谓优质极点，但仿佛还是差了点什么，框架和表达多于情感和真挚。
看了SF的special提前映 男主来做了Q&A 如果电影最后落在做决定本身上也许会更深刻 临终前赋予“另一个个体”延续你生命的机会 你是否会给予 但故事还是放大了家庭和亲情上 最后的告别也有一些刻意 其实故事的立足点很好 一个没有希望的人 有掌控的权力 和一个充满希望的人 但希望却不在自己的掌控之中 这个矛盾点如果可以再深入发掘一下 就更好了
当近端科幻切入到人文关怀与家庭伦理这样的敏感题材，胜在处理的细腻真挚。那在任何一段关系中，被人替代总是不好受的。
890｜3.5，克隆之后毫无区别是直奔主题的软科幻设定，然而剧本不够简洁，情感的表达也不够有力。故事是残酷而温暖的：即使另一个我与我自己毫无区别，但与家人的爱的记忆无法被抹去，怀着它离开这个世界无疑是痛苦的，但也只有知悉亲情完好如初，才舍得放手离开。中间一段配乐居然是Radiohead的Idioteque。
前几年姐姐走的时候，母亲悲痛欲绝。那年我余生最大的愿望就是：走在我父母的后头，我不希望他们活在世上再难受地想念我。今晚看完这片我想，如果天不遂人愿我走在父母的前头，我真的希望能有个克隆人替我活着，照顾我的父母妻女。最重要的是我的父母和女儿不知道我已经走了，不用太伤心难过。这是一件想想都觉得幸福的事情。
四分半吧，总觉得有些东西没有拍到，好像少了点什么。
上乘科幻片，對人性的思考絲絲入扣，無套路，有真義。
你担心你去世后家人无法接受，找个克隆人代替你，有没有想过你太太，母亲，父亲也是这样想的，结果一家子克隆人生活在一起，其乐融融。
工整的科幻想象。too much man.
即使身体组成物质相同，思想相同，但那也不是我自己
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
