Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
比预告片差远了，没有新意，战争片段有点混乱，个人觉得还不如金刚川
●2021.10.28
生完老二第一部影院电影，三个小时，基本从头轰到尾，哄的脑壳儿疼
致敬最可爱的人！
重点不够突出，长的没有什么吸引力。主旋律可以，但是没必要靠音乐烘托，感觉力气用错了地方
●中心不明，支线太杂，台词、演技太浮。看的是自行脑补的对真实历史的感动。
第一是前面大多数时间是以点代面，这个点还没讲完，后面就突然跳跃到大局观，这个点没了前后呼应。就像听了两小时武松打虎的评书，最后十分钟就讲到了梁山招安。
3.毕竟是大导演的联合作品，画面的质量非常高。
其实不是很喜欢战争片 but看完一星期不想读英文
我真的觉得现在的年轻人应该好好看看这电影，我也还能算年轻人吧，从头就开始哭，一部电影让人为之动容，它已经足够好了。
历史当然应该被铭记，烈士当然应该被歌颂。然而如果只忙着传唱历史，忽视了当下，那么牺牲只会白费。叙事越宏大，越显得今时今日的冷漠。解放军战士们是抱着希望后代活在没有硝烟的时代才愿意付出生命，却绝不会想看到如今的人命不被重视。看主旋律电影的每个人都应该搞清楚纪念那段历史的真正目的。小村庄夜战拍的不错，后面的总攻就有些凌乱和刻意煽情。放着这么一个不听命令的熊弟弟在自己部队里不教训，未免有些牵强了。
每一秒钟都是自愧不如以及觉得每一个人都牛逼 和平真好呀 可以半夜出来看电影
为有牺牲多壮志，敢叫日月换新天
是我看过最好的战争片 2d看出3d的效果
韩东君好帅啊～易烊千玺戏请继续宽下去～另外不用拍那么长其实
●7.0分
说实话挺一般，中国现在拍战争片，很容易就拍成动作片，主角除胡军一个没死，4个人硬是发挥出一个营的战斗力。不要求拍出格局更大的反战电影，主旋律对于提升民族自豪感确实是必要的，但我们更希望看到真实的历史。
事迹本身所带给我的感动或者激动远大于影片所传达出来的
支持这类型电影。前赴后继的热血属于年轻人的鲁莽，可如果没有这股鲁莽与无畏，这山河，谁来守护？
《长津湖》如果没有拍最后的长津湖战役还是挺不错的。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
