Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
珍奇的天书被锁在天庭石门之内，分明“天道无私，流传后世”，却被高束庋藏，不欲人知。
反观现在的国产 甭提了 再加上某局搅和 真是一点进步没有
7/10。最后的奔跑想到《大人帝国的反击》，日剧跑真燃啊~借着推理外衣批判精英教育，小新剧场版依旧有锋芒，但让本就成熟的五人组来讲青春是否过早？新风官方糖最甜的一次了吧，动画的仁慈就是他们永远5岁，永远是朋友。
当官的手下是坏的，
天道无私，留尘后世。
儿时果然是看过的，83年的？那时有彩色了吗？做成这样，真是了不起
为什么我们坏人就不配用火呢？我们得到火种也是会高兴地跳舞的呀
民俗集中营，BBC撤资，审查宽松，客观成就了一次放开手脚的国产喜剧动画回归。歌舞段落，武侠致敬，噱头配角，明星配音，符合西方价值的中国普罗米修斯。动画人设个个富有奇趣，灵感来自年画、门神、戏曲等。//2021修复重映，杜比影厅：片尾有一个小纪录片，讲到动画追求“奇、趣、美”，上美厂老厂长要求“不重复别人，不重复自己”，老艺术家们住在一个院子里，一起创作，很了不起。修复版配音还是原来的，配乐是上海交响乐团重新配的，原配乐用了很多传统民乐、80年代合成器，今天看来仍然很时髦。
因为结局是这样我还是加了一星，两只狐狸跳舞那段可能是葫芦娃里宴会的雏形，玉帝垃圾应该是天庭反骨人的统一共识吧！袁工可以说是中国普罗米修斯。
小时候觉得这部动画片怎么就那么“特别”呢？现在回想起来，可能是“诡异”吧
当年最早在电影院看的就是天书和大闹天宫 但是天书的印象更为深刻些 一直过了很多年还记得狐狸精的姿态和小皇帝说话的腔调 呵呵
那时候拍这种带着浓厚“反封建反官僚”味道的动画是很普遍的，也才会出现这么有意味的戛然而止、带着崇高性和悲剧色彩的结局，如今怎么敢这么拍，美其名曰怕孩子们看不懂，其实是权力象征转向了，那时还好说自己是老奶奶那一帮的，现在却会被观者想象成是县太爷、小皇帝一帮的。
虽然说是被一群幼儿园小朋友教育什么是青春，但u1s1确实还挺热血。那些曾经觉得无意义的事，做过的很傻逼的事，都是我们的青春，那正是我们的青春。燃烧吧！享受吧！少年！！
相比现在的什么蓝猫，什么羊的，这片简直了都。
https://movie.douban.com/review/14061688/
袁公盗来天书，以善民生。然，天上人间，大抵相同，老百姓大多朴实善良，有权者维图私欲
童年经典，现在觉得也挺好看的，我们的传统神话故事可是博大精深的，现在反而没有以前拍的有味道了，失去了精髓!
狐狸精，和尚，地保，衙役，县令，府尹，皇上，玉帝和普罗米修斯
上美三宝：《大闹天宫》《哪吒闹海》《天书奇谭》
在电影院观看《天书奇谭》修复版的过程中，我脑海里不断冒出一句话：“请把我最爱的《大闹天宫》比照此标准进行修复！”【天河城飞扬】20211107
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
