Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
然而不解的是，《侏罗纪》系列经久不衰的魅力来源难道不应该是恐龙本身吗？当它们被清扫到一边沦为配角，而人类反客为主的时候，它便忘了它是谁，沦为一部主打冒险与动作的普通类型片，在《夺宝奇兵》《勇敢者游戏》等等这些竞争对手面前没了底牌。
我不知道还会不会有新篇章
不带脑子看挺开心的，无人伤亡真好，老卡司也融合得很好，最后一部老三主演+新三主演，挺合家欢的。霸王龙是本系列最大隐藏吉祥物。
哇，还有什么比在大银幕上看恐龙打架更爽的事情了嘛！老人组情怀满格。马耳他追车戏帅爆了，隐约有谍影重重的感觉。人老色衰的爵爷明显失宠了，黑人小哥全程抢戏。想拥有同款花衬衫。还想收藏一整套恐龙玩偶。
因为我抱有的期望值太低了，以至于观影过程中觉得没那么糟糕，看看各种恐龙来回耍也挺好
感觉恐龙就单纯道具龙，出来吓唬吓唬人，情节就不说了，整体还是挺刺激。就勉强OK确实难以超越。
好莱坞为啥这么执着于黑库克？库克应该是友军啊？
特效不错，文戏太拖，观众都是冲着恐龙来的，谁要看你在那里硬上价值观宣扬人与自然和谐共生的正能量啊！
两条故事线，主角团的亲子旅游团线，老一代的主角团的夕阳红旅游团线，双方戏份五五开，顺便也让老一代主角修成正果。两边都是疯狂talk，作为招牌的恐龙却存在感很低。
电影难道不是叫侏罗纪世界吗，咋感觉成了谍影重重。。。
自大的人类有什么意思呢？
好久没看过这么傻逼的电影了 前半段文戏快四十分钟就是不停的唠嗑讲话 老三部曲的主角出现完全没有感动 个破蝗虫和恐龙有半毛钱关系吗 有钱拍这些废戏不能多弄点恐龙cg？ 导演可以滚出好莱坞了
无聊，我是来看恐龙的，为什么要看人类吵架和蝗虫
麦莎是无性繁衍的人类后代，那是生命之光逆转过去，重现人间。
速度与激情:蝗虫世界 能在电影院看电影已经很感动了，要求真不能太多。
处处是致敬，但好的没学到多少，情节逻辑硬伤多到吐槽无处下口的地步，最要命的是恐龙不够多，为情怀给个三星吧。
狂拽酷炫吊炸天的全程高能大爽片，22年目前观感体验最好的一部院线电影，久违了超级大片，久违了零点首映场，久违了IMAX影厅，IMAX2D的体验好得不能更好，作为一部商业电影很好的做到了文戏和动作戏的有效权衡，好于系列第二部，最后的主题升华“人与自然和谐共生”更是全片的高光时刻！特效炸裂，摄影美绝，演技不拉垮，爱了爱了！
影院按摩椅的吱吱声让我一度以为身边有蝗虫，恐惧体验直接拉满！侏罗纪构建的恐龙世界品种多样，动画合成也是活灵活现，几次“龙口逃生”的动作戏份也蛮刺激！基因工程对自然生态的影响与上一部相呼应，人与恐龙和谐共处虽是美好愿景，但依我看，实现起来依旧需要漫长时间。
《侏罗纪世界3》同它的前作一样，并没能摆脱每况愈下的宿命。只能依靠巧合推进的叙事，东拼西凑将恐龙与人拼凑在一起，电影纵然试图用《侏罗纪公园》中角色的回归制造情怀，但过多的人物支线使剧情杂乱无章，反成为了画蛇添足的败笔。
尼玛，当恐龙真累，你只想出来吃顿饭，你的食物却想让你升级成喷火龙
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
