Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
TAGV | “O vento está a mudar, meu amigo.” Jacob, 你可知这不曾出口的名的命运？在去往无果重逢的途中，偶遇那自溺的身影（是的，自溺，是柏林留给你难以咂透的混浊印象，是你閤眼时变幻的光，所有人在其中无法自保），抛下那本终于被焚毁的随笔（车站、咖啡馆、房间、卡巴莱的爱与思考与冲动与梦魇），天真地去往来自威丁堡的旧时怀抱——仿佛一切可以重来。Jacob, 拦下你的是什么？是友人绝望而讽刺的遗言吗？是这成群穿过梦境和现实的晦暝往事的暗合吗？还是这灾难时代对你的恰时怜悯？死在家乡的河水中，在无人理会的幽静处，在“只是偶然的生命”的起点，也在“注定的死亡”的终点。
对瞬间地考古，对当下地建构，对权利地解剖，对爱情地颂歌
为了ED加一星，故事毫无新意，人设和造型总有一种似曾相识之感，让我想起火影、死神还有其他好多动漫……
与火影忍者有有一定的相似之处，但是打斗场面和那个兄妹之间的那种感情，那是比较感人的，我觉得还是非常不错的，但唯一的就是他里面的主角确实牺牲比较大
得分：7
从《无主之作》开始就开始特别喜欢男主，这部果然又没有让人失望！
2.布莱斯·帕斯卡写过一段话，其中他提到，秩序是死亡的预兆
这个世界需要实干家，理想主义者要么被社会排挤，要么自寻死路。
你在痛苦活着，失去爱人失去朋友，纳粹在身边忽隐忽现，世界崩塌的时候，一个不会游泳的人如何去拯救溺水的人？
看不得这种揪心的东西
导演有才，手持摄影模仿出了两次世界大战之间人们的眩晕、恐慌、不安，一切都在摇摇欲坠的边缘。
镜头等各方面都不像是这个年代拍出来的电影，尤其开场半个小时，那些街道建筑人物场所声色迷离构建出魏玛共和国的浮世绘，人物在历史的洪流中抑郁沉浮，纵情只在迷茫的间隙中，最终被淹没。导演用影像构建精神，将各色人物理想幻灭的过程漫长地坍塌下来，而爱情散落其间，苦苦支撑却变成了砸穿一切的一部分。观影过程痛苦的点在于居然与这种抑郁有共鸣。3.5.
借一位英文老哥的评论：“he wants to save that last bit of flame....”
“我们可以再认识一次。”
一开始觉得色调有些问题，越看越觉得，这种现代感，不就是当下吗？才华横溢的理想家死于卑鄙玩笑，将鲜嫩可口的爱人献给50多岁的老头，往亲人落魄的口袋里偷偷塞钱。我会每天下午3点都在咖啡馆等你，如果你不明白，我们的过去就没有意义。在一场又一场热切盲目的呼喊中口不能言，淹死我的不是河水，而是那颗仍抱有幻想的心。
有一种电影属于“我能get到它的点但就是看不进去”
德式浪漫和忠诚。“遇到你之前，我并不知道自己可以如此忠贞”
炭治郎和伙伴们的成长经历篇，能看到他们的时刻在进步，很不错的一部动画电影
11.2 被突如其来的结局吓哭了，呜呜呜，太绝望了吧！！！这部电影像散文，形散神不散那种，真要说快三个小时看的一点不急，那绝对是假的。但是每一个个场景真的都很带感啊。看完串在一起，草，太绝望了。女主莫名让我觉得神似宝拉贝尔，以至于一度我想不起来宝拉贝尔长什么样。看完电影，把俩人照片一比也不像啊（破案了，女主在无主之作里演的是男主姨妈，宝拉演男主女票，我当时就以为俩人一个人。两年半过去了，我还以为俩人是一个人）。汤姆西林都快四十了，还是好少年啊~~~
这个世界如同人生一样，重构然后打破，再重构。再打破
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
