-
视频
视频
资讯
视频
资讯
Exploring the role and symbolic meaning of the Crown Jewels in the centuries-old coronation ceremony, The Coronation shows these objects of astonishing beauty in new high-resolution footage. The film tells the extraordinary story of St Edward's Crown, which was destroyed after the English Civil War and remade for the Coronation of Charles II in 1661. It has only been worn by Her Majesty once, at the moment she was crowned.
On 2 June 1953, on one of the coldest June days of the century and after 16 months of planning, The Queen set out from Buckingham Palace to be crowned at Westminster Abbey, watched by millions of people throughout the world. A ceremony dating back more than a thousand years was to mark the dawn of a new Elizabethan age.
Viewing both private and official film footage, The Queen recalls the day when the weight of both St Edward's Crown and the hopes and expectations of a country recovering from war were on her shoulders, as the nation looked to their 27 year-old Queen to lead them into a new era.
In the film, The Queen says: 「I've seen one Coronation, and been the recipient in the other, which is pretty remarkable.」
For audiences unfamiliar with the story of the Crown Jewels and the regalia, the film explains their contemporary relevance to the UK as a nation and to the enduring purpose and the work of monarchy. They are symbols of the relationship between the Sovereign and the people, and the duties and responsibilities of leadership.
The film also features eyewitness accounts of those who participated in the 1953 Coronation, including a maid of honour who nearly fainted in the Abbey, and a 12 year-old choirboy who was left to sing solo when his overwhelmed colleagues lost their voices.
非常不错的法国影片，一改法国电影“浪漫”的印象。通过一起扑朔迷离的强奸案件，涉及阶层、文化，性别等多方纠葛对立，显得案情异常复杂；片子没有从上帝视觉展现事件的全部真相，而是像真正庭审一样，着重从男女主角视觉展现各方人物的观点，观众在电影结束前也不敢肯定自己掌握了事件的真相。庭审结束时三个律师的结案陈词精彩异常，特别是那位年轻女律师的发言真是震耳发聩，堪称女权宣言，而那位主张男主缓刑的律师似乎表达了主创人员的观点，起到平衡的作用。
本来就是一件模棱两可的事，讲得也是稀里糊涂，各持一词的辩说，让人感觉有些故意制造冲突和矛盾。这种事不像那种留下明显作案痕迹或有某种意图的案件，那样侦破或辩论会更有意思，也更有技术含量。
中规中矩的剧场版吧，感觉没什么波澜，很多桥段依然是在致敬，但是也没有做出自己的新意，但是相比于TV，好了很多了。
2022.3.28
和最后的决斗叙事方式类似，但这部只是通过男女两人不同的视角展开这个案件，我们可以深切感受到双方的想法，就像结尾律师的结案陈词说的一样，两位都说的很好，但比较而言我更加赞成男方律师，虽然我是个女性，但想了下结尾和女方陈词，“只有说 不 才代表不同意吗？沉默就代表同意吗”好像也很站女方……这本身就很难定义，并不觉得像其他影评说的摇摆不定（胆怯）
我该对德凯报怎样的期待呢？
剧场版比预期的好些，硬煽情总归是煽情。迪迦是人变成光，特利迦是光变成人，落点都是一样的，每个人都可以变成光，但要一起变才行。
并不觉得这种差异能够被磨平，毕竟男女本性使然，只能尽量追求和谐与公正。
第一次看法国庭审戏，挺有意思的。女主演得很好。
比TV好看多了。
当下的镜头拍了说不清楚的裆下事，想挡下海啸的狂舌恐怕也是难上加难。
多一颗星给徐铮的故事，就那个还不错！父辈并不意味着艰辛与苦难，沉重与担当。
精彩电影不容错过…
没有想象的好，尤其沈腾的那段，不好看，也不好笑
UGC Les Halls 庭审上证人女孩的发言或许最能说明这个案件的痛点，许多性侵犯因频繁发生而被所有人视为“正常”。当有女性感觉这“不正常”时已难以论证。女律师最后的论证铿锵有力，多少隐性的威胁在逼迫女性就范。
《诗》与《鸭先知》不错，不过另外两篇就拖后腿了。
如果是你的女儿被强奸你会怎么样？杀了他。一个事件，两种认知解释。
（ 6 / 10 ）从这四个单元安排的顺序来看，有一个内在的子辈与父辈的继承关系：被《乘风》里父辈保护的孩子，可能就会成为《诗》中新中国成立后第一代科研人员，第一代科研人员的子辈也许又是《鸭先知》中涌立改革潮头的先知，这些敢于第一个吃螃蟹的先辈，又为下一代《少年行》的引领超越打下基础。这种继承关系不是微观的 “子承父业” ，而是宏观的让祖国强大起来的代际发展。父辈牺牲子辈传承，子辈站在父辈肩膀上，才让中国 “从站起来，到富起来，再到强起来” 。
剑吾的反智不能没有下线啊，咋还把隔壁拉过来挡枪
不该叫“我和我的父辈” 应该改名父与子。章子怡这篇无论从格局上还是故事架构上都是最好的。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
