A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.
Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.
This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.
One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.
- JohnHowardReid, imdb
Hatching.2022.1080p.WEB-DL.DD5.1.H.264-EVO
恶魔的侵入是如此顺理成章，剧情不拖沓不造作。恐怖外衣下，揭露的还是原生家庭问题，在这样的家庭里，黑暗战胜了纯真。很真实，我很喜欢。
可能是我老了吧，怎么觉得后面全是教坏小孩子
魔由心生，一代孵化一代。立意不俗，执行差点儿意思。
借一个恐怖故事的外衣，讲述成长故事。很多父母以爱的名义播种在孩子内心仇恨的种子
节奏可能有点散，警示畸形的家庭关系和观念吧。
关于小女孩和她意外收养的变异怪鸟的故事。影片中有一些不错的场景，但整体看来，影片中所发生的一切都没有得到充分的展现和解决。影片主体发生在一个塑造略显刻板的家庭，姐弟矛盾和母亲的出轨成了女主呵护与孵化怪鸟的动机，但关于这些状况的发生和延续，并没有得到有说服力的展现。最终怪鸟取代了死去的女主，类似的情节也曾发生在很多电影中，但由于影片并没有一个出色的铺陈，因此这一结局也显得无关痛痒，震撼力不足。
还是及格的片。给个四星吧。希望下次继续努力。
压根没打磨过剧本，想一出是一出，又想讽刺女性又把男性拍的比女性还愚蠢，画面也拉胯，从怪物到人的过程割裂、毫不猎奇
嗯...不吓人倒是有更社会性映射，病态父母养育孩子，终把孩子美好的一面抹去，只剩扭曲邪恶...
失衡的家庭分裂衍生出黑暗面，怪鸟转世孵化喂养另一个自己重建第二家庭？
作弊、逃生等不少方面太误导小朋友；特效不行，还不如直接拍一个动画片；改编不是乱编；为什么现代国语片总是如此尴尬？
影楼质感的服化道，制作也真就是80年代的水平。整得跟大风车剧场似的。
有《钛》的味道。一个破碎的原生家庭：软弱的爸爸、虚荣和控制欲强的妈妈，孵化了一个黑暗嗜血的女儿。
北欧清新风的一部家庭问题导致成长恶化的90分钟小片，特效还算细致，可惜相似的类型和观感太多，感觉没太出彩
2022-06-18
看完了，最后Alli站起来彻底变成了Tinja，还以为会来个妈带她去参加体操比赛得第一的情节。起初蛋壳里出来的小怪兽多可爱呀渐渐渐渐的变成了女主就不那么可爱了。
具备很深的教育意义，适合家长和老师观看。现代教育要从唯分数论到关注其他更重要的东西，比如爱的教育，素质教育等等。我们大人跟孩子沟通的桥梁就是童话故事，如果没有童话世界，我们就相隔更远，更为陌生。孩子是我们的老师，教育也是我们的必修课，通过孩子的眼睛，我们可以看到更多不一样的角度，不能自以为是。
让我想起了无辜者 遗传厄运 超喜欢这种神经质的恐怖片哈哈哈
买了两张票却看了不到十分钟，终于在优酷看完了。挺好的，人性故事，非常棒！
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
