A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.
Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.
This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.
One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.
- JohnHowardReid, imdb
看结局男主的女朋友也会死吧
🤔，有点乱，是故意的乱，不符合节奏和剧情的乱。
按照硬汉侦探叙事结构做的软弱小说家“卷入”事端，这类故事的重点是被动性，是弱势参与方的逐步解谜。
只能2星半。。穿越➕多人格。。创意还可以，就是，好无聊啊，男主蛮废物，作死的依然作死。最后大boss也还是大boss，那要这个电影干嘛呢 没有爽点
1964年有led灯？！道具师你给我出来 我不打死你！真的！ 其余都很好 就是有点乱 然后就 乱了
说好的造塔呢？故事觉得差一口气啊。。。
他们的塔是浪漫的世纪表白，我们的塔是镇压爱情的坟墓
这酸臭的爱情占比太大了，应该改名叫埃菲尔的早年爱情故事。白白浪费了那么好的故事和场景，耗资巨大复原场景，又请来英语区火爆的炸子鸡艾玛，属实有点可惜。
豆瓣分數過低，多加1星，沒想到當年遊巴黎最無聊的景點，背後有這一段感人故事。結合理性科技工藝+感性主角自己的愛情與堅持，不懂大家批評愛情戲多餘是什麼意思？A的是他的謬思，他的生命動力來源
很古典的法兰西范，日落之下塞纳河旁边的铁塔平台上，男女主迎着夕阳 ，落日余晖中她们深情相拥 影片对当时的巴黎场景描述不错，并且获得最佳布景、最佳服装的提名 影片讲了建造铁塔的故事，以宇母“A”形状，金属编织的蕾丝，坚固而美观，高耸入云的巨塔，设计独特，建造时遭遇罢工，停资，舆论诋毁。最终埃弗尔站在荣誉的领奖台上。当然还有法国浪漫爱情故事，两段不同时期爱情的穿插剪辑 晚到20年的重逢 旧情再次被点燃 即便是谨慎的相遇 但是 爱依然还在 像无法控制的烈火又一次肆意的被点燃 最终还是为爱放手，日落夕阳的塞纳河旁边 辉煌的埃弗尔铁塔落成典礼上，人群中的女主和舞台上的埃弗尔他们满含泪水 各自安好 ……
🙄三张假钞作为故事的根基实在太弱了，完全撑不起前面营造的悬念…总之故事的逻辑和说服力太差，甚至都可以忽略节奏上的毛病了…
时空错乱 看的我好乱，最后男主的死到底属于自杀还是被杀啊
虽然改编得很差，但还是能感觉出原小说的趣味。
垃圾电影，前30分钟像弱智一样，看了想睡觉，果断关了！
风俗业司机小说家误入一家三口失踪疑案，旧书屋老头，小白脸食物链，江湖理发店，都市传说大哥大；前半段社会性文学性和悬疑感都塑造不错，结尾 Peter Pan 落点实在不太行
时空交错，循环，驱魔，鬼屋探险，宗教等各种元素揉在一起，又有细节，音效和妆容加持，其实蛮出彩的。
恐怖片就像放了辣椒素的廉价外卖 偶尔吃一吃很爽 但是没什么营养 吃多了还对身体不好
5.几的评分确实太低了，该影片氛围感拉爆，你总期待着男主和学生们能一齐找到出口出去，没想到所有人都死了。单纯的惊吓恐怖之余还有一些循环设定，相对废脑，更有趣。女鬼纯情面相真的很容易被理解成是乖巧可怜的受害者啊，没成想是大boss 。那句“你知道从哪里开始循环的吗”，互动感特别强烈！惊喜！题外话，韩国人的大嗓门和哗众取宠的发音方式真的有些做作，波浪声结尾
设定很好。可惜循环与不同时间角色的联动太乱，角色个性实在不突出…
埃菲尔铁塔，讲了20分钟的塔，120分钟古斯塔夫埃菲尔爱情故事，感情戏看得我好尴尬，他们抠床单，我用脚趾抠出一座铁塔。（1.5，多出来0.5给温柔的女儿，爱了爱了）
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
