剧情介绍

  Fraught with over obvious symbolism, Hartley's early feature is nonetheless a joy to watch. Hal here shows us his uncanny ability to cast his characters perfectly came early in his career.
  Adrienne Shelley is a near perfect foil to herself, equal parts annoying teen burgeoning in her sexuality (though using sex for several years); obsessed with doom and inspired by idealism gone wrong she is deceptively – and simultaneously – complex and simple. Her Audrey inspires so many levels of symbolism it is almost embarrassingly rich (e.g., her modeling career beginning with photos of her foot – culminating her doing nude (but unseen) work; Manhattan move; Europe trip; her stealing, then sleeping with the mechanics wrench, etc.)
  As Josh, Robert Burke gives an absolutely masterful performance. A reformed prisoner/penitent he returns to his home town to face down past demons, accept his lot and begin a new life. Dressed in black, and repeatedly mistaken for a priest, he corrects everyone ("I'm a mechanic"), yet the symbolism is rich: he abstains from alcohol, he practices celibacy (is, in fact a virgin), and seemingly has taken on vows of poverty, and humility as well. The humility seems hardest to swallow seeming, at times, almost false, a pretense. Yet, as we learn more of Josh we see genuineness in his modesty, that his humility is indeed earnest and believable. What seems ironic is the character is fairly forthright in his simplicity, yet so richly drawn it becomes the viewer who wants to make him out as more than what he actually is. A fascinatingly written character, perfectly played.
  The scene between Josh and Jane (a wonderful, young Edie Falco . . . "You need a woman not a girl") is hilarious . . . real. But Hartley can't leave it as such and his trick, having the actors repeat the dialogue over-and-over becomes frustratingly "arty" and annoying . . . until again it becomes hilarious. What a terrific sense of bizarre reality this lends the film (like kids in a perpetual "am not"/"are too" argument).
  Hartley's weaves all of a small neighborhood's idiosyncrasies into a tapestry of seeming stereotypes but which delves far beneath the surface, the catalyst being that everyone believes they know what the "unbelievable truth" of the title is, yet no two people can agree (including our hero) on what exactly that truth is. A wonderful little movie with some big ideas.

评论:

  • 玥雅 1小时前 :

    除了主演一样,其它都是无节操的模仿。

  • 珊雅 4小时前 :

    “冰雪西部片”,革命浪漫主义的调调,前半段的敌我对峙极为精彩,可后半部分就陷入强行上价值的主旋律窠臼中了。张涵予、森博之、范伟构成“好家伙、坏家伙、怪家伙”的人物关系,至于其他角色则完全割裂了“三足鼎立”的局面。周也饰演的庄妍代替的是原版芳林嫂的形象,此次彻底成了个走过场的;杨皓宇饰演的黎教员代替的是李正,不过他起的作用仅是帮助牺牲的同志入了党,对老洪的行动意义不大。抗战片不能只注重牺牲与歌颂,还得从中挖掘新的东西。《铁道英雄》氛围营造足够成功,除此之外,也只剩那句“微山湖上静悄悄”了:不错,这次连微山湖都是没出现的。

  • 轩中 4小时前 :

    个人评价:

  • 桓星 3小时前 :

    剧情缓慢,前期过多的铺垫很不必要。剧本和台词的问题非常大,有几处经不起推敲。久经历练的战士相信车轮能“辟邪”,纱布竟然也能算“药品”。

  • 树正平 8小时前 :

    这部片子在适度的改编下展现了我党的民间抗日历史,整体来说还不错;剧情上,没对将我方人员进行过度夸大,日本方面也没刻意弱智化,整体智商在线

  • 酆思萱 9小时前 :

    不知道是不是因为中日又友好了,这部片子里居然将日本鬼子改称为“日本子”,弄得我颇为不习惯

  • 歆彩 0小时前 :

    005号。中规中矩的平庸之作,打斗不爽,人物不动人,情感更是没有,至少是很难进入,张涵予说话的腔调能不能改改,太做作了,真难受。

  • 糜灵凡 1小时前 :

    剧情弱鸡,全靠范伟演技。场景、摄影都挺不错,但剧情比样板戏都简单,前半部分剧情简单到无,反复重复一次次扒火车镜头,浴室都能商议开会了,传情报明明可以在浴室传,偏偏要排着队在日本鬼子眼皮底下传纸条,逻辑不通,就为了让女角硬行加入?莫名其妙让她送个牌子去,然后再见面就说送牌子被盯上了,也只能留下加入,但最后打了个酱油,又走了。这都什么事啊!

  • 析骊艳 9小时前 :

    基努每拍几部好电影就会拍点烂片来奖励自己。

  • 杨涵桃 9小时前 :

    骗钱之作。B站和油管上的前三集精剪剧情介绍视频的结构,用换头app修了修脸就拿出来放了。隐隐的漫威化倾向尤其让人不齿。动作场面还不如《疾速追杀》系列的一根脚毛。四倍速看都嫌浪费时间。

  • 稷晨 3小时前 :

    首先,向伟大的先烈致敬,打到小日本🇯🇵。

  • 辰延 4小时前 :

    如果我拔管能去到一个这部影片没有发生的真实吗?

  • 鲍晨星 8小时前 :

    1铁道游击队这个大IP,怎么反复来拍?不要脸,还敢写自编自导。

  • 晓振 4小时前 :

    不敢恭维,不是迎着“东方红”的就是好片,这是把观众当傻子吗?杂乱无章的故事结构,故弄玄虚的情节配乐,唯一最最值得期待的就是范伟老师的表演,出神入化,精彩绝伦,举手投足都是情感。

  • 美寒 9小时前 :

    开头还挺燃,中间节奏有点糟,结尾吧实在不喜欢这种莫名其妙1V1。但是有几个镜头,真的挺感人的。

  • 用昌盛 2小时前 :

    虽然节奏慢,也没什么出彩的地方,但比长津湖好看一些吧

  • 骏嘉 3小时前 :

    这片子传出开发消息的时候完全不抱希望,所以观感超出预期,因为我一直以为这会是一部纯圈钱的没诚意的烂片,会害得原作晚节不保。与经典自然比不了,但导演还是在有限的预算下做到了最好,我相信要是华纳多给点预算这部电影会更好。整部电影其实就是在戏仿系列第一部,大量对于老系列的致敬和对现实的揶揄使得影片非常轻松浅显又情怀满满,影片节奏的把握也极好。当然特效和武打戏因为成本原因显得很寒碜,但可以看出导演在尽力做好这些,尽力在保证与前作互文的前提下,营造更有想象力的场面,我认为她是成功的,就算不是想象力,也足够有趣。这部电影我是满意的,很满足。当然确实不够好,毕竟神作在前,一部合格的爆米花怎么也都差点意思。但是这冷饭新炒真的香。

  • 马闲静 1小时前 :

    常识性错误都有,连云港是1953年才起的名字

  • 茂俊晖 1小时前 :

    前几天在一个中午和下午,带崽间隙看完。如果是十多年前,我会觉得这是一部很好的电影,现在只觉没有新意,主题情节都可以预先猜到。

  • 聊梦槐 1小时前 :

    当然,影片最后炸毁军火列车那一段,槽点也确实不少,主要扣分点

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved