You are never fully liberated from Auschwitz, 11 July 2016 Author: Red-125 from Upstate New York The French movie "À la vie" was shown in the U.S. with the translated title "To Life (2014)." It was written and directed by Jean-Jacques Zilbermann. The film is a Post-Holocaust saga, although it opens with scenes in Auschwitz that are truly horrific. Hélène (Julie Depardieu) and Lily (Johanna ter Steege) were friends in Auschwitz, and they managed to survive the death march from Auschwitz to Louslau together. A third friend, Rose (Suzanne Clément) was unable to walk, so they were forced to leave her behind. As it turned out, Rose survived until the liberation of Auschwitz. The three did not see each other again until 1962, when they come together for a reunion at a beachside resort in Northern France. We learn early in the movie that Lily divorced her husband after the war, and is living as a "free soul," with no permanent partner. Hélène and Rose both married concentration camp survivors. The plot of the film--based on the lives of three actual friends--revolves around their interactions during the reunion. No matter how much ice cream they eat, and how they display their new bathing suits, thoughts keep circling back to Auschwitz. They quarrel about tiny details which they remember differently. They revive horrible memories. It's clear that the reunion will change their lives, but whether the change will be for the better or for the worse is an open question. For reasons I don't understand, "To Life" caries a terrible IMDb rating of 6.1. Fortunately, we saw it as part of the excellent Rochester Jewish Film Festival. If we hadn't had "All-Event" tickets, we probably would have stayed home. This is a movie to be seen, not missed. Ignore the rating and seek it out. It's available on DVD, and it will work well on the small screen. See it!
不像今天是荣誉的象征
好恶搞and男主也太丑了。剧情稀烂啊，感觉kingsman的招拍要被玩坏了。
好恶搞and男主也太丑了。剧情稀烂啊，感觉kingsman的招拍要被玩坏了。
三星半。或許不以原本系列的牌頭去執行會更好，說到底這是一套歷史解讀劇情片，多於前傳動作大片。佛地魔的演技固然有保證，而「萬王之王」同樣不是省油之燈。
他们何必在乎塞尔维亚那种小国？
豆瓣评分为什么这么低？我觉得这个电影很精彩，恶搞了一下20世纪初欧洲那段乱七八糟莫名其妙的历史，一战，巴黎革命，苏联革命，都只是一个阴谋。俄国妖僧跳着华尔兹还是芭蕾打架那段最精彩，连我这种不懂舞蹈的都能看出来优美和华丽。这样的电影可以继续拍，把整个二十世纪的历史都串起来，二战，冷战啥的都串起来，那就精彩了。这一部的CULT风格稍显不足，犹记得第一部电影各种爆头血浆喷射的快感，可能是不想评级太低，到了这部血腥程度大幅减少了，稍显遗憾。不过也是，要还像第一部那样番茄酱满天飞的话也不可能在大屏幕上映了。
戏说一战。奇特的恶趣味依旧，傻儿子战壕里死的猝不及防。列宁和希特勒的出现也是有意思。没记错的话，列宁屠了沙皇全家之后没两年就死了。
英国人给自己拍的一部戏说历史剧， 除了英国人是绅士外，其他人全是疯子或者傻子。很多历史桥段充满了恶趣味。
我刚刚才保护你 我不需要保护
放低期待值之后没有想象的那么难了，也符合王男一贯嘴上manners maketh man，实际nothing really matters的“虚无”世界观，特别是这个源起居然是个父承子志的故事，玩笑开得有点漂亮。可惜我们古迪老师出场太少了…p.s. 看评论区把爆米花片上升到历史课，搁那儿上纲上线地破防，真是比电影本身还精彩啊哈哈哈哈哈
50/100 马修沃恩戏谑历史完全没有昆汀那般有趣
情节很无聊，还让我猜错了主角，片子感官优雅俏皮~~
马修沃恩说不拍X战警续作是防止烂尾，结果没过王牌特工这道坎
世上最无奈事就是无法说服年轻人别犯傻，
这么严肃的片头啊。。。看到这个衣服的名签，嗯？？？原来是个间谍片啊。。。伏地魔啊伏地魔你为啥这么想不开。。。
Eye to eye踮脚屈膝也太可爱了吧!~…
电影很断裂，三部分就像拼凑而成，一part是成长电影、第二part是军事题材、第三part才是特供片。
他们何必在乎塞尔维亚那种小国？
恶搞没问题，一上来戏仿《1917》和俄国皇宫刺杀都挺好笑的，但致命伤在于你以为它是正剧的时候它告诉你只是恶搞，你抱着恶搞的心态往下看它又想回归正剧，稍微严肃一点的战争戏就拍得跟过家家一样，到最后情绪不知道该落在哪，两部分都很糟糕。其实最疑惑的是为什么放着前两部现成的剧情和人物架构不用，非要开发这么个没意思的前传草草收场，挺可惜的。
会跳芭蕾的Rasputin这个人物设计的非常棒。King's Man确定不把战斗力很强的山羊也收了？
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
