A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.
Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.
This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.
One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.
- JohnHowardReid, imdb
2022年7月2日观看。翻译的问题，字幕有点乱。开场的那个做出来的长镜头有点新意。血腥、情色都毫不掩饰，乌克兰的电影不少都很残酷。
被林允儿和姜河那的高甜片段骗进来的，还以为是什么惊心动魄的爱情故事，好家伙整一出韩国版《真爱至上》。养眼是真的，老土也是真的，好在韩国人还是有点认知在，没把总统从修罗场里拖出来谈恋爱。
好像每年都有这样一部电影，只是为了完成限定日的仪式感，基本上能看就行。几个选角应该调换一下，最无法认同的就是土狗配小仙女。韩智敏的收尾好随意，过于草率也很可惜。无功无过多一星给狠狠拿捏我的老年人爱情：“如果有天我们又变成了一个人，到时候就跟我结婚吧。我们总有一天会再见的，在那之前你要好好生活。”
明星很多，低配版的真爱至上，很梦幻，适合假日这种本来就需要高糖分的时候看，逻辑啥的都是其次的。
至于后边的故事就太老套了，男主结尾的放弃生命，以求救赎的处理太刻意了。
民族志纪录片上放的，导演和制片人来了现场。踢皮球的小男孩影射了女主的哥哥（发高烧去世的儿子），第一幕出现在烧纸钱的时候，哥哥出现，以及最后一幕，父母去世时，家人团聚，时空交织。 影片既显沉重，又想略带温暖地收尾。感觉导演想表达的太多了。中间蓝色窗帘的那一幕和结尾躺在水里的那个……迷惑？不如躺水里直接结束了……
揭示了一个人最终的结果！一个人的一生始终在等待，夏天的母亲在等待夏天的爸爸，而夏天的爸爸也一直在等待死亡！ 😭
俄乌战争打的火热，全球新冠，世界动荡，这个大环境下来看这部片子让人感触更深！正如片子开始长达十分钟的转场镜头一样，晃动、多变，让人感叹生命无常！
阅，贴图完毕，转战下一个~///一直没人发吗？那我煮了一份
30/100。#Venice#前半段特别惊艳，尤其是以开头一段囿于狭小空间内却呈现出时间变换的长镜头为代表的一批高级炫技，充分彰显了导演对于影像掌控力的自信。然而在短暂的高级之后整部电影便迅速进入了令人闹心的阶段：沉浸在血腥作呕的画面与吵到令人神经衰弱的音效中的观众还要接受一套陈旧的直男式说教，黑帮老大在经历人生渡劫后的自我觉醒这样看了就不想再多看一眼的情节到了2021年居然还有人大肆渲染，看完真的觉得威尼斯的选片委员会真的品味有问题。而女性在其中依然迂腐地充当着在身体和心理上被双重凌辱的工具，更是让人无法忍受。 @2021-09-10 23:34:17
“父母在，人生尚有来处；父母去，人生只剩归途！”
能大胆说出口的喜欢，能收到回应的喜欢，真好啊。新年快乐。
值得票价，在这个寒冷的冬日带着父母孩子，进影院看这个安静的电影。
太普通了吧也，而且不是已经弄了个很普通的新年前夜了吗，怎么还来啊？！
评分 -100分！全片镜头单一，有没有打灯都怀疑，就像个单人单干拍出来的视频一样的…剧情即便涉及老年痴呆症题材，也是白开水的推进…。这位导演，下次也请你别拍戏了吧
阵容华丽，故事稀碎，我是真的不喜欢元真儿。。。
看到金英光求婚我还是哭了, 不过不是电影的本事, 是金英光的本事(不对, 只要是求婚画面我一般都会哭就对了)
作品值得看第二遍，前十几分钟艺术性很强，浓缩了沃瓦成长的家庭与社会，伴随着激烈的迪斯科节奏，正式拉开疯狂的人生。越往后越暴力，既能看到乌克兰整个社会颓废的一面，也能看到斯拉夫人粗犷野蛮成性的一面。虽然算不上佳作，艺术性与思想性无法达到统一，犀牛的悲惨结局，算是一个报应！
国版《真爱至上》，多线故事里只有“自杀男孩和叫醒服务”、“暗恋多年的男孩结婚了但新娘不是我”这两个故事最有趣，其他的不痛不痒。老年CP在公园追逐的戏，和婚礼上卡农的伴奏都瞬间梦回《我的野蛮女友》
天 开始十几分钟我都后悔为了看这部电影新开了一包薯片 这个阵容拍了这么个烂片 害
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
