Whenever I see La Paura I think of it as a companion piece to Eyes Wide Shut, or maybe it is the other way around. Adultery makes both films tick but in different ways. I think Phillip French was right on the money when he pointed out a Wizard of Oz thing in Kubrick's last work. Like Dorothy, Tom and Nicole go through fantasies and nightmares and at the end Dorothy's reassuring childish motto "there's no place like home" is ironically updated to the adult circumstantial adage "there's no sex like marital sex". Kubrick's take is intellectual, he never leaves the world of ideas to touch the ground. He taunts the audience first with an erotic movie and then with a thriller and refuses to deliver either of them. He was married to his third wife for 40 years, until he died. Rossellini was still married to Ingrid Bergman when he directed La Paura; they had been adulterous lovers and their infidelity widely criticized La Paura is a tale, a noirish one. The noir intrigue is solved and the tale has a happy ending. The city is noir; the country is tale, the territory where childhood is possible. The transition is operated in the most regular way: by car, a long-held shot taken from the front of the car as it rides into the road, as if we were entering a different dimension. Irene (Bergman) starts the movie: we just see a dark city landscape but her voice-over narration tells us of her angst and informs us that the story is a flashback, hers. Bergman's been cheating on her husband. At first guilt is just psychological torture but soon expands into economic blackmail and then grows into something else. From beginning to end the movie focuses on what Bergman feels, every other character is there to make her feel something. Only when the director gives away the plot before the main character can find out does he want us to feel something Bergman still can't. When she finds out, we have already experienced the warped mechanics of the situation and we may focus once again on the emotional impact it has on Bergman's Irene. In La Paura treasons are not imagined but real, nightmares are deliberate and the couple's venom suppurates in bitter ways. Needless to say, Ingrid has another of her rough rides in the movies but Rossellini doesn't dare put her away as he did in Europa 51, nor does he abandon her to the inscrutable impassivity of nature (Stromboli). His gift is less transcendent and fragile than the conclusion of Viaggio in Italia. He just gives his wife as much of a fairy tale ending as a real woman can have, a human landscape where she can finally feel at home. Back to the country, a half lit interior scene where shadows suggest the comfort of sleep. After all, it's the "fairy godmother" who speaks the last words in the movie.
好恶哈哈哈那块黑色长方体坠落到星球上，我们：2001太空漫游！😂
是核爆炸吧？是吧
感官刺激确实强，讲个什么故事确实也没明白。
A-
光怪陆离，荒诞，战争，毁灭，开端，一切即是结束，也亦是开始。
在走入高清的视觉之后 一切都不再显得神秘诡谲了
剧情很一般，最后另一边还在等吧
疯了，神经兮兮又恶心得不得了的定格动画，隐喻的东西不好妄加猜测。
虽然有很多细节看不懂，但大体还是能够体会到那种无限轮回的虚无，绝望与毁灭
邪典具象符号隐喻之作，血腥暴力的无限轮回。
我该怎么说啦，第一遍看是荒谬和混乱的。并没有想看第二遍的欲望。所以不存在更深层次的解读。欲尝试将埋在影片里的折射与影子拼凑完整再讲出来，最后想想。为什么要给作者解释，或者为了我有多明白他？当然都不是。如果蛋糕切的每一块都是一个作品，我会给他4分，但这一整个蛋糕，我只能给他3分。
词汇表里 除了封神 只有烂的 对于一切无法理解的事物 只有两种走向的认知思维
营造的气氛太牛逼了，每一个画面都充满了细节，意味深长
莫名其妙不是探索 丑陋恶心不是荒诞 拼贴杂糅更不是艺术
工业废土，科幻战争，血腥暴力，古怪迷幻，这是一场满足你猎奇心的盛宴。
《疯神(2021)》 （2022.1.26） 4
9分，感觉全片都在阐述着帕斯卡对死亡的荒诞哲学。
妖魔鬼怪，群魔乱舞，怪力乱神，血腥肮脏！虽然是部动画片，但还是比较重口，看的让人有点生理不适，而且里面隐喻太多，看的似懂非懂！但还是值得一看的。
形式用心了，也够疯。但，语境始终没超脱西方上帝那点事儿。
连着看了两部德国新拍的关于二战前时期题材的影片，都是德国人对他们自己的那段历史的反思，也可称为德国的“伤痕文学与电影”，反思自己的历史，特别是那些错误、罪恶的历史，值得关注和肯定。本片是部传统风格的历史片，以希特勒和张伯伦等战前召开的“慕尼黑会议”、出卖捷克领土的真实历史事件为纲，虚构了两位首脑身边、参加会议的德、英两个年轻人的故事，戏剧性、可看性不错，制作也到位。网友们对该片的历史观和虚构情节有不少争论，评价不一。我缺少研究不去评论，只是觉得今天看它，还是很容易联想到当前美俄在乌克兰危机的外交政治斡旋、博弈，似乎历史永远是在重复，教训很难被吸取。对历史、政治有兴趣者可以看看。另一部电影《法比安》则是一部很个性化的文化艺术片，内容没这部丰富，技艺上不错。另谈。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
