This early 70's giallo by Umberto Lenzi is certainly among the best in his filmography and also in the whole genre. Personally I think Lenzi's best films are the funny cartoon-turned-film Kriminal, the stylish giallo Seven Blood-Stained Orchids, the explosive Napoli violenta and this. In the eighties he did plenty of film trash in form of Eaten Alive, Hitcher in the Dark or Black Demons, all of which are ripping something off and/or very dull and slow moving. Knife of Ice came when the giallo boom was at its hottest and the result is convincing.
Technically the film is superb, containing great cinematography in the beginning when we learn about the main character's trauma towards trains. From this point on, Lenzi shows us his ability to benefit the widescreen and, for example, the bicycle ride near the forest is genuinely beautiful! This scene also shows Lenzi's ability to build suspense, very slowly but meaningfully. After all, there aren't so many murders in the whole film, only the suspense circulating around the murderer's identity.
One suspect is a devil worshipper which brings new aspects to the mystery. Since the final scene takes place in a church, one can wonder if Lenzi wanted to comment on something, maybe the hypocritical morale of church and superstition. The main character (Carrol Baker) is mute which demands a lot from her face and eyes. The actress works very well, giving us a believable performance circulating around the emotions of fear and mental pain. The other actors are good, too. The finally, however, may not give too positive a sight about female sex since they all are expressed rather negatively in the film, one way or another. Still this is easily among the most noteworthy in the genre, not as bloody as the Argento films, for example, but equally suspenseful and visually also interesting.
整体一部不如第一部冲击力强，但是故事简单明了就勾勒了两个父亲，不，隐隐约约好几个父亲角色的刻画。有些硬逻辑说不过去的地方，但是整体电影节奏、气氛和演员的表现力都很不错。第一部很好，这一部也还行，但是不要有第三部了。
比起1来说，真的算很差了，没有警察和记者的助攻，完美结局能达成吗？况且，我并不认为结局是多完美的一场戏，非但不反转，甚至让人觉得：哦，就这啊……
其实还行 能看得进去 只是我一直在想 这个故事得发生在另一个国家 才能完整的讲
父亲的力量 还是很感动 肖央的演技越来越厉害了
1，这个翻拍系列的最大意义就在于，替我们发现好电影，反正拍得再好也拍不过原版，我为啥不看原版呢？虽然第一部还可以，可是相对于原版……辣眼
“我们可以忍受卑微地活着,但他们不能把我们当虫子一样随意踩死。”
太低龄了，低龄到我觉得应该标记个“满15岁的观众禁止观看”的警告。
什么误杀啊简直你泥马的诈骗！！！自己前作热度都蹭！！
评分7-8分之间，续作本来就难拍，况且相比第一部，翻拍的是本来就已经很成功的《迫在眉梢》。但是《误杀2》做到了，在原作的基础上有升华有延展，更主要的是留下了plan C给观众无限想象。肖央宇宙再下一城。
整体结构还是很不错的，细节和反转也都不会到位。但就是普通人真的反抗不了的基调，怎么说呢，也不知道是好还是不好。
太低龄了，低龄到我觉得应该标记个“满15岁的观众禁止观看”的警告。
7 开头的车祸表明了记者的结局，所有的英雄都难逃上位者权力的网。误杀2遵循了第一部反强权和体制的主题。缺点在于人质表现废笔太多，青年演员表演不尽人意。
器官移植名单如此透明，市长都需要跟屁民抢心脏，这地下器官买卖估计也没多大赚头；
内容假，情节也没有什么出奇，翻牌吗，但还是苦的稀里哗啦，做父母的不容易
三星我还是愿意给的。这几天在看《谁是凶手》。肖央演技确实在线，因为两个一起看，很明显的看到了肖央演技的区别。
剧组是不是把我当傻逼，最后还要用萤火虫前后呼应，生怕我看不懂，气得出门马上要点根烟平静下
3、毕竟我以为我是来看悬疑犯罪警匪片的，结果是盗版了老港片风格的“感动中国+315晚会”，且单就剪辑水平来说还不如那几年的央视节目组
没抱太大期望去看，意外觉得还不错，虽然看得出竭力在营造煽情的氛围，但电影也实实在在做到了这一点，还是能够感动到比较感性的人，并且部分剧情的反转还是有些出人意料。影片最大的瑕疵或者说漏洞还是心脏大小的设定问题，本身孩子是因为心脏太大而需要做手术，可最后换的依然是个成人大小的心脏，逻辑上有些难以自洽。肖央的演技可以说炉火纯青，比起误杀1更加娴熟，为影片增加了可看点。或许这部电影不叫误杀2，评分会略微高一点，不过结尾林日朗的死亡，倒也勉强能够扣题，一个朴实的父亲为了孩子遭到误杀的故事。
故事线和结构看上去都比第一部好很多，但几次翻转都处处在意料之内，让整个剧情的张力都小了很多。胜在感情戏，父母对孩子的爱的确让人很难不感同身受，败在所有往悬疑靠的戏份，实在是太不悬疑了。比起大多数形象动机分明人设立得住，反派全都单薄如纸片，无趣了点。（现在大陆的片子要沾点现实题材就先把故事搬出国啊）
这个跟原版一比，只能说差的不是一星半点，叙事上就是强行倒叙，一点技巧都没有，于是人物铺垫也不够，情节逻辑也有问题。你说心脏都直接拿走了，就没别的医院能动手术了？市长大人抢心脏杀人灭口的事都干得出来，最后会良心上受到谴责主动帮助主角？还有，这剧情和误杀有个半毛钱关系，起个新的名字不行吗？
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
