Future of Food In the past year, we have seen food riots on three continents, food inflation has rocketed and experts predict that by 2050, if things don't change, we will see mass starvation across the world. This film sees George Alagiah travel the world in search of solutions to the growing global food crisis. From the two women working to make their Yorkshire market town self-sufficient to the academic who claims it could be better for the environment to ship in lamb from New Zealand, George Alagiah meets the people who believe they know how we should feed the world as demand doubles by the middle of the century.
【India】
George joins a Masai chief among the skeletons of hundreds of cattle he has lost to climate change and the English farmer who tells him why food production in the UK is also hit. He spends a day eating with a family in Cuba to find out how a future oil shock could lead to dramatic adjustments to diets. He visits the breadbasket of India to meet the farmer who now struggles to irrigate his land as water tables drop, and finds out why obesity is spiralling out of control in Mexico.
Back in Britain, George investigates what is wrong with people's diets, and discovers that the UK imports an average of 3000 litres of water per capita every day. He talks to top nutritionist Susan Jebb, DEFRA minister Hilary Benn and Nobel laureate Rajendra Pachauri to uncover what the future holds for our food.
【Senegal】
George heads out to India to discover how a changing diet in the developing world is putting pressure on the world's limited food resources. He finds out how using crops to produce fuel is impacting on food supplies across the continents. George then meets a farmer in Kent, who is struggling to sell his fruit at a profit, and a British farmer in Kenya who is shipping out tonnes of vegetables for our supermarket shelves. He also examines why so many people are still dying of hunger after decades of food aid.
Back in the UK, George challenges the decision-makers with the facts he has uncovered - from Oxfam head of research Duncan Green to Sainsbury's boss Justin King. He finds out why British beef may offer a model for future meat production and how our appetite for fish is stripping the world's seas bare.
【Cuba】
In the final episode George Alagiah heads out to Havana to find out how they are growing half of their fruit and vegetables right in the heart of the city, investigates the 'land-grabs' trend - where rich countries lease or buy up the land used by poor farmers in Africa - and meets the Indian agriculturalists who have almost trebled their yields over the course of a decade.
George finds out how we in this country are using cutting-edge science to extend the seasons recycle our food waste and even grow lettuce in fish tanks to guarantee the food on our plates.
He hears the arguments about genetically modified food and examines even more futuristic schemes to get the food on to our plates.
在狙击五班点名的时候，一次次呐喊，记住了一张张年轻的脸庞，胖墩、王文武、小徐、米老二……感谢《狙击手》，让我们了解这部分历史，感谢这群可爱的战士，让我们可以幸福生活。
如果张译的戏份更多点就好啦 好久没在大荧幕上看到他了 哎。。。
与某某用惨烈大场面，人数多烘托相比，简直是太高明
印象最深的一幕，狙击五班的战士们齐声高歌时，另一边的美军们起内讧拳打脚踢。两方差距，高下立判。脆弱爱哭是大永的缺点，也是他惹人怜爱的闪光点。饰演大永的陈永胜找到了最适合他的角色，预感会成为下一个“许三多”或者“谷子地”。电影冷峻又温暖地再现了“冷枪冷炮”运动不起眼的一隅，让世人看清了血肉模糊的战争真相。期待春节档票房大爆。
总的来说，影片制作水准在线。章宇不愧是文艺片黑马，操着一口重庆味的贵州话，演技够“霸道”，打酱油的张译很抢戏，最后一场“点名”情绪到位了，比枪战的场面更抓人。
这个电影太奇怪了_(:зゝ∠)_ 处处充满矛盾 片子里的美国，既被暗戳戳的吹捧了一下，显示人家有契约精神不打小孩子有人道主义精神，又在明面上显示美国人不合常理的又蠢又坏，没有集体意识。抗美援朝到了电影里所说的阶段更不可能有这种现象出现。 志愿军战士，明面上显示的是牺牲精神集体意识，实际上暗戳戳的踩了一脚，有很多不必要牺牲和不聪明而且可撤回却硬是执行下去的，为了煽情而煽情的镜头，我都怀疑是反串黑。 怀疑屁股坐哪边，怀疑打高分的人有很多过度吹捧的，当然也可能是我本人蠢。太奇怪了，非常差劲的一部电影。
最冷的枪 最白的天地 最热的雪 以小见大 精准拍好一个小场面比五六场乱轰炸更强 真的看厌了那些动不动就狂轰乱炸的所谓zhu旋律片了 这片唯一一点不太能欣赏的就是子弹的特效 重复太多次 有点拉胯
比同期上映的水门桥好看太多了！！！就像片尾说的，五班的故事仅仅是一小部分，同样的人和事太多了，但就是这么一个小小的战斗，每个人物的刻画更加触动人心，每枚子弹的射出都让我提心吊胆，每位战士的牺牲都符合情理，没有惊天地泣鬼神的煽情，一百分不为过！
尊严只在剑锋之上，真理只在大炮射程之内！（2.1 16:55~18:31）
短小精悍的电影，舞台剧风格的设定，受限空间回合制的故事，若干个短剧用亮亮的身份这个麦高芬串起来，用近景正反打撑住一部电影时长的紧张感，难度较高。背景同样是冰天雪地，肃杀感和节奏把控的难度比《悬崖之上》要高得多。最好的部分是剪辑，节奏把控提升了整体观感。中方故事重点是班长的领袖气质传承和战友情，美方个性表达也没太丑化。
张末是不是拍的镜头太多了点，我军哭戏也太多了，在生死战场上，永远热泪盈眶，擦干眼泪开始神狙击。一点也不克制。哎
无法想象，总有人甘愿为国家和人民的安定付出所有，包括生命。
如果两个美国人只是想把这个小孩带走，偷偷走目标最小，为什么要特意搞一台坦克，生生把自己变成这么大的靶子？
实际成品比预告片给人的观感好很多，和《水门桥》大场面正面硬刚不同，本片更讲究对狙的智斗，在结构上层层递进，比隔壁也更有“电影感”。
这真的是忍不住~五星。PS:一进影院身后一对年纪较大的情侣，一直嘻嘻哈哈浪言浪语，本想喷他们的，一把年纪搞什么飞机，随着剧情发展，两人竟然放声痛哭，好吧，爱国主义教育目的达到了~
唱歌那段强行煽情，尴尬。
跟冬奥开幕式一样，干净脆生，大道至简。观看体验很不错，清清楚楚的讲了一个漂亮的故事。ps：到底国师参与了多少？是只挂了个名还是整体把握了一下？如果这是他闺女的真实水平，就还挺不错了，已经胜过很多不成器的星二代好几条街了。
国师这部新片其实挺普通的，但是放在国师身上显得很有意思，因为我们会发现，相对已前些年的那些大片的繁复，这两年的片子一直都在做减法，剧情上，摄影上，讲故事上，都在越来越内敛。相对于早期的大师气象，越来越像匠人了，在不同类型的影片中做尝试，这是一种非常难得的经验。
印象最深的一幕，狙击五班的战士们齐声高歌时，另一边的美军们起内讧拳打脚踢。两方差距，高下立判。脆弱爱哭是大永的缺点，也是他惹人怜爱的闪光点。饰演大永的陈永胜找到了最适合他的角色，预感会成为下一个“许三多”或者“谷子地”。电影冷峻又温暖地再现了“冷枪冷炮”运动不起眼的一隅，让世人看清了血肉模糊的战争真相。期待春节档票房大爆。
儿子取名钢板，诱敌挖土狙杀，节奏配合双击，幽灵埋伏轰山，小步枪对坦克……从班长交换人质开始，故事就编得太假太应付了，有点可惜
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
